U.N. Enablers of 'Aggressive War'
September 8, 2017
Special Report: U.N. investigative reports, like a new one condemning Syria for alleged sarin use, are received as impartial and credible, but are often just more war propaganda from compromised bureaucrats, reports Robert Parry.

By Robert Parry 

Many people still want to believe that the United Nations engages in impartial investigations and thus is more trustworthy than, say, self-interested governments, whether Russia or the United States. But trust in U.N. agencies is no longer well placed; whatever independence they may have once had has been broken, a reality relevant to recent “investigations” of Syrian chemical weapons use.

There is also the larger issue of the United Nations’ peculiar silence about one of its primary and original responsibilities, shouldered after the horrors of World War II – to stop wars of aggression, which today include “regime change” wars organized, funded and armed by the United States and other Western powers, such as the Iraq invasion in 2003, the overthrow of the Libyan government in 2011, and a series of proxy wars including the ongoing Syrian conflict.

...The Charter declares in Article One that it is a chief U.N. purpose “to take effective collective measures … for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace.” Article Two, which defines the appropriate behavior of U.N. members, adds that “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state…”

However, instead of enforcing this fundamental rule, the United Nations has, in effect, caved in to the political and financial pressure brought to bear by the United States and its allies. A similar disregard for international law also pervades the U.S. mainstream media and much of the European and Israeli press as well.

There is an assumption that the United States and its allies have the right to intervene militarily anywhere in the world at anytime solely at their own discretion. Though U.S. diplomats and mainstream journalists still voice outrage when adversaries deviate from international law – such as denunciations of Russia over Ukraine’s civil war – there is silence or support when a U.S. president or, say, an Israeli prime minister orders military strikes inside another country. Then, we hear only justifications for these attacks.

[Read full report]:







MARTIN, GLEN  Constitution for the Federation of Earth With Historical Introduction, Commentary, and Conclusion (2010)

MARTIN, GLEN Triumph of Civilization:  Democracy, Nonviolence, and the Piloting of Spaceship Earth (2010)

ALMAND, EUGENIA & MARTIN, GLEN  Emerging World Law  Key Documents...Global Constituent Assemblies & the Provisional World Parliament (2009)

Smith, J.W.  Economic Democracy (2009)

MARTIN, GLEN  World Revolution Through World Law  (2006)

(the "blue book")


BELITSOS, Byron  One World Democracy (2005)



October 9, 2018
Re: A Movement of Movements, Let the Earth Constitution Be Our Leader
Roger Kotila (a response to Janet's email shown below)

I agree with Janet and Chuck on the need to bring us together towards a MoM (Movement of Movements). Unfortunately the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) need to be adjusted to include a demand for a "new UN," one given the tools it needs to succeed. SDG is an inadequate basis to create a powerful MoM.  

The needed changes to establish an MoM are not included in the SDG plan.  SDG will not end wars -- one of the key global problems. Militarism and nuclear weapons could destroy the world as we know it. There would be little worthwhile left to "sustain."  To add to this problem,  the military is a leading polluter of the environment. Lastly,  war takes away the resources which could end povery worldwide.  MoM must have a means to end militarism.  

MoM using the Earth Constitution as our leader
The World Constitution & Parliament Association addresses these fatal flaws at the international level, including of course, the U.S. for a MoM, conducting a series of Provisional World Parliaments under the Earth Constitution -- the first green constitution ever drafted and a model governing structure for a "new UN" or, if you prefer, for an Earth Federation.

I've pointed out repeatedly that the "Constitution for the Federation of Earth" (aka Earth Constitution) provides an ideal "leader" for a worldwide combined movement with peace, anti-war, environmental, and human rights groups, as well as for the majority of nations suffering under the foot of the P-5 Veto nations at the UN who just happen to be the world's largest weapons' dealers and warmongers... along with their favorite allies and proxies (eg, Israel;  ISIS;  Saudi Arabia; Columbia, Ukraine, etc.).

Chuck, like myself, are world federalists/world citizens.  Short of forming a democratic world federal union government -- a "new UN", we will fail to end these damned wars, eliminate threats of a nuclear nightmare, fail to provide adequate protection for human rights, and lack a better response to climate change.

And not to worry,  for in the proposed "new UN," there will be no "world president" or "world dictator."  No Trump to bully everybody else.  The proposed constitutional replacement for the obsolete UN Charter uses a Parliamentary model, not a Presidential paradigm, hence avoiding the danger of authoritarian rule.  A World Parliament gives "we, the people" a real voice in global affairs, something lacking in the current undemocratic UN geopolitical system.

The world community wants a global peace system, not the current geopolitical war system.  

Watch for the Democratic World Federalists campaign demanding UN Charter Review -- we are calling it THE SAN FRANCISCO PROMISE.  The defective Charter is why the leaders of Bully nations who commit world crimes are (literally) above the law.  The P-5 veto protects the leaders of these nations and their allies from criminal prosecution.  It's a free pass to break international law routinely and not worry about the ICC.   

Roger Kotila                                                  
*****************                          ********************                                     
 Janet wrote (10/9/18):  (See Roger Kotila's response above to Janet's call for a MoM.)
Re Chuck's "FIRST:  Bring together the leaders of various movements (peace, environment, social/economic justice/human rights) to brainstorm a national strategy for activating a unified coalition (movement of movements - MoM) for funding and achieving the 17 SDGs ASAP!"
Forging a unified peace-antiwar-justice-environment coalition is what I tried to advocate as a focal purpose of our Peace Congress. The initial tepid response trailed off. If we couldn't have done something like this, we could've started what Chuck advocates.  But it seems nobody's really interested enough to get it off the ground.
Thanks, Michael, for your post about climate change.
   Janet                                                                                                                                    STOP

September 1, 2018


Dr. Bob Hanson


We all need a role model, hero, or mentor. I have had several very important ones in my life.  One of them died recently, a woman named Mary Harris. Mary passed-on just 49 days short of her 101st birthday.  I served with Mary on the board of the Democratic World Federalists.  She attended meetings regularly up until the last few weeks of her long life.  Living at her beach home in Pacifica, she climbed up 160 stairs every time she went anywhere and relied on public transportation and friends for rides.   



Mary was contemptuous of war, and called it simply another form of mass murder.  At 97, she wrote:  “Some say Some-mores are a delicious campfire treat.  I present here a truly delectable idea: No-Mores. No-more bombs; No-more war; No-more torture; No-more invading countries for their resources; No-more making enemies; No-more killing for land; No-more crude oil pipelines; No-more fracking;  No-more “solving problems”  by hating, killing or revenge; No-more excuses for global violence; No-more massacres; No-more mass incarcerations; No-more starvation; No-more homelessness; No-more prejudice; No-more racism, sexism, or ageism; No-more ghettos; No-more extrajudicial killings; No-more “all options are on the table.”


American exceptionalism, but not in a good way

Like many of us, Mary considered herself a global citizen.  She would have bristled at the idea that the United States is an “exceptional” nation…the view held by many right-wingers that implies that America doesn’t need to comply with any global rules. 


Unfortunately, our country is in many ways an exceptional nation – but not in a good way.  Compared with other industrialized countries we enjoy the greatest income inequality, the highest poverty rate, the worst child well-being, the lowest social mobility, the highest infant mortality, the most people without health care, the highest obesity rate, the highest carbon emissions, the highest anti-depressant use, the worst gender inequality, the highest incarceration rate, the worst murder rate and highest military spending.


F-35 Joint Strike Fighter a $1.5 trillion dud

Expanding on this last point: Today over half of the nation’s discretionary spending is going to the Pentagon.    We are spending more on arms than we did at the height of the Cold War, when adjusted for inflation.   We spend as much on the military as the next 12-15 countries combined.  This while the administration and Congress maintain there isn’t money to solve the homeless crisis, end poverty, or repair the nation’s crumbling infrastructure.


One example of wasteful spending is the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program.  Over the course of its life, the program is projected to cost $1.5 trillion.  This program is not only unnecessary, but the planes have failed test after test; it is now questionable whether they will ever be “combat-ready.”


Stay afraid, America, stay very afraid

The military-industrial-congressional-big media complex manages to keep military spending at astronomical levels by freezing the American public in a state of fear.  For decades it was fear of Communism.  When this wound down, it became a fear of terrorists.  Now we see a fear of Islam and/or Russia.  President Eisenhower put it very well in his farewell speech to the American people: “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.  This world in arms is not spending our money without high cost. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.”


Mary’s spirit lives on…

Mary is gone, but not forgotten.  Each day I ask myself what I can do to contribute to her dream…a world without war.  I know that what I can contribute is miniscule in the big picture, but if enough of us do something to bring lasting peace on Earth maybe it will happen.  Please support World Beyond War, Code Pink, the American Friends, Democratic World Federalists, Peace Action and other groups devoted to the cause.   -- by Dr. Bob Hanson

[First published 8/29/18 in Dr. Hanson's "Progressive View" column in the Rossmoor News, California.]

Human Beings Face Extinction:   We need to act now

[Abridged Version for Earth Federation News & Views]
Glen T. Martin
August 2018

[Editor's note:  This is an abridged version of Professor Glen T. Martin's "Human Beings Face Extinction: We need to act now."  Subtitles have been introduced by the editor to highlight certain key points.]
The global climate is unraveling at rates far beyond the predictions of scientists. The studies are so common by this date, and the scientific evidence so pervasive going back at least half a century, that there is no need to cite sources about this fact.  The oceans are dying, the fisheries are becoming exhausted. The forests are dying. They are devastated through human overuse, logging, wildfires, acid rain, and rapidly changing climate conditions.

Agricultural lands are drying up and losing productivity, the land, water, and air are polluted. Artificial human-made chemical compounds are found in the tissues of every living creature on Earth, with unknown synergistic effects. The oceans are rising, displacing millions of coastal dwellers and submerging prime agricultural lands.

The habitats for animals and life in general are disappearing, and many species go extinct daily. The polar caps are melting, irrevocably altering the planet’s climate. Rainfall is irregular, with periodic droughts alternating with devastating floods. ....

At the same time, the global human population unsustainability continues to increase. ... ...Noam Chomsky declares: “Survival of Organized Human Life Is at Risk Due to Climate Change and Nuclear Weapons.”

UN Charter's untouchable sacred cow prevents global citizenship
Meanwhile, the nations of the world focus on “sovereignty,” militarism, national independence, trade wars, and unsustainable capitalist development. “Sovereign independence” is written into the UN charter in multiple ways and continues to function as an untouchable sacred cow, preventing the development of global citizenship everywhere on Earth. Each nation inculcates loyalty into its citizens and criminalizes any non-government sponsored relationships with foreign officials, which they label “disloyalty” and “treason.” Trillions of dollars are poured down the toilet of militarism that are needed to protect and restore the planetary environment. 
Few people seem to care
Nuclear weapons are refined and made “combat ready,” and countries like North Korea correctly understand that without the nuclear deterrent, they would suffer the same destruction as Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya. For the imperial system led by the U.S. and its NATO allies continues to work for a global hegemony to counter the growing influence of Russia and China, politically and economically, without concern for human rights, dignity, or the welfare and livelihood of many millions who appear of less worthiness to live because they are “not us.” Books such as Nuclear Madness by Helen Caldicott or The Doomsday Machine by Daniel Ellsberg regularly appear detailing the many times that the near use of these weapons has brought humanity close to extinction, but few seem to care. Our fragmentation, hate, fear, and need for “enemies” is so much greater than our desire for a future for our children or the planet.
Shock alert: It's a war system, stupid!
Our planetary system is inherently a war system requiring enemies and producing vast profits for the industries that supply and encourage this system.  As climate and military disasters around the world increase so do the profits of the system of “disaster capitalism” described by Naomi Klein in her 2007 book The Shock Doctrine the Rise of Disaster Capitalism. Meanwhile the big banks and masters of the global monetary systems continue to dominate unsustainable global economics, running the world as a debt system from which they derive not only vast profits but vast political power, as Ellen Brown showed in detail in her 2007 book The Web of Debt.
Is the ruling class "insane" or simply criminal?
A Google search reveals a number of articles by different authors who have declared that the ruling class is “insane.”  Indeed, if bringing the entire planet to ruin in the service of ones personal greed for wealth and power is insane, then this label is appropriate, although I prefer the term “criminal,” since the majority of the ruling class of the world are simply criminals who control the mass media, the politicians, and the UN in the service of their criminal enterprises that are bringing humankind to extinction.
In the US, the majority of both Democrats and Republicans in the Washington, DC, government are criminals in this sense, serving both themselves and the ruling class. Many so-called liberals in the US are working to remove Trump as President, and to “take back our country.”  But the truth is they never had “their country.” The ruling class has always had it, and human extinction advanced perhaps just as rapidly under Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama. The mass media, the war system, and the “sovereign nation” propaganda keep the people of the US asleep no matter who is president. Whomever fills that office can do little because the system itself defeats rationality, recognition of our common planetary humanity, and the changes necessary for survival.
Refusing to become world citizens is a death sentence
Trump is a symptom and not a cause.  People refuse to actualize what Karl Marx called our species-being.  They refuse to become world citizens in any real sense of this word.  They cling to their sovereign borders and delude themselves that somehow extinction can be avoided if the peoples of some 193 different, militarized sovereign nations all care about the environment, recycle, and “dispose” of the trash properly.  Rather than living in what I call a “boundary-less world,” they insist on their puerile boundaries and identities, even as this exacerbates the rush to total climate collapse and human extinction. To cling to a tiny, exclusive identity that divides one from others who are “not me” becomes more important than the survival of the human race.
Mass media a main source for immature ideologies
It has often been pointed out that the mass media keep ordinary people distracted, immature, and unable to think clearly.  The mass media are designed for this purpose.  For more sophisticated ordinary people, there are sources like the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post, which frame the immature ideologies in a more erudite manner to satisfy the egoism of the “educated” middle classes.  But the entire world system is immature and structurally inculcates immaturity into the peoples of Earth. 

Misguided loyalties to outdated systems
The system of sovereign nation-states is nearly four centuries old, often said to have begun formally at the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, developed at a time when people were riding horses and fighting with swords.  The system of capitalism is just as old, developed at a time when the Earth seemed to have inexhaustible resources, was able to receive unlimited wastes from human industries, and the population of the world was a fraction of what it is today. These systems structurally condition people into loyalty to their puerile national identities and into a capitalism that has no concern for the environment or human dignity, but only for egoistically pursued private profit. “Freedom” becomes promoting egoistic self-interest regardless of the social or environmental consequences.
The world seen from space, or from an airplane, has no borders. ...
Bigotry and hate start here
People everywhere need to think: “I am an American,” not a Russian or Chinese.  “I am of a certain skin color, not like those of red, yellow, brown or black complexions.” “I am a Republican, not a Democrat.” “I am a Christian, not a Hindu or a Moslem.”  And it is the same everywhere else, national loyalty requires these identifications, as does so-called religious belief.  In India, people go crazy over their Hindu identity, or their Moslem identity, or their caste status.
"Borderless" means we are One humanity
A borderless world does not mean that we abolish all practical administrative distinctions such as electoral districts or jurisdictions for local, regional, or national governments. A borderless world means that people have realized their species-being and become one in their common humanity and dignity. This is the world as seen by the great teachers of human kind such as Jesus Christ, Jiddu Krishnamurti, the 14th Dalai Lama, Mahatma Gandhi, or Martin Luther King, Jr. Despite their great differences, all these leaders lived from their fundamental humanity.
...Today, these identities are tearing the world apart because they mirror the structural (political and economic) fragmentation of the world into sovereign nation-states and the capitalist egoistic drive for power and profit.
We can "jump-start" a world peace and justice system
We do not need to wait for humanity in general to grow up and embrace the holism of planet Earth, our planetary biosphere, and the human race.   ...We can ratify the “Earth Constitution” and place the common good of the planet, its citizens, and its living creatures at the heart of a global public authority that can reign in and control the egoism and nihilism of both the politicians and the capitalists.
... The Constitution for the Federation of Earth ( is already completed and ready for ratification. It places what is common and universal (the common good of the Earth and its citizens) above the nations and the corporations as the single most legitimate source of governmental authority. 
World Parliament
The Earth Federation will establish a democratic World Parliament with authority over both global corporations and so-called “sovereign” nation-states. For the first time in history, our common human dignity will be the basis of the global public authority, not fear, enemies, war, greed, and exploitation. There is no other way to end environmental and human destruction by the corporations as well as war and terrorism by the nation-states.
Earth Constitution and the universal good
The Earth Constitution establishes global democracy predicated on what is common and universal and empowers an Earth Federation Government to conform both economics and politics to the universal common good.  Article One defines that universal common good as ending war, protecting universal human rights, addressing poverty and inequality, and protecting and restoring the planetary environment. Law enforcement is assured through civilian police who must themselves obey the law. There is no military. Here we have the only true source of legitimate government authority: the common good of the Earth and its citizens: a global peace system, justice system, and sustainability system.
... If we actualize our species-being, then we are open to love, concern, and identification with all, including the Earth’s many other living species.  We no longer need to cling to an identity that excludes the others (whomever they happen to be).  Some 200 years ago, the philosopher Lessing wrote to the Christians and Jews of Europe: “if only I had found one among you for whom it was enough to be called a human being!” My newest book,
Global Democracy and Human Self-Transcendence, develops these ideas in some detail.
The Constitution for the Federation of Earth structurally establishes a planetary democratic government ... All persons become World Citizens first, responsible for their planetary home and future generations. Their primary identity becomes our common humanity. We need to ratify this Constitution if we want to avoid the rapidly approaching fate of planetary extinction of the human race. 
It is time for humanity to grow up and face responsibility for ourselves and our precious planet. It is time we ended the global war system and converted to a peace, justice, and sustainability system. It is time we united our planetary home in a global democracy under the Earth Constitution.
-- Professor Glen T. Martin 

May 12, 2018

Progressive View        Rossmoor News    Walnut Creek, California

Bob Hanson

[First published May 9, 2018]                                                                                                                        


I’m betting you have never heard of the World Constitution and Parliament Association.  This international movement has been working  diligently  since 1958 to come up with a better way to run the world.  There have been many international meetings held in various countries to develop what is known as the  CONSTITUTION  FOR THE FEDERATION OF THE EARTH.  It was written by the combined   efforts   and input of hundreds of folks who consider themselves world citizens.


The paper has been modified and improved many times since the first world assembly which was held in Interlaken, Switzerland.  The document is based upon six principles: 1) The common Humanity and Dignity of all human beings; 2)   Economic   democracy and equal opportunity for all persons; 3)  Sustainability and ecological health for the planet; 4)  Unity in Diversity of all Nations, Communities, Religions, and persons living together in harmony on Earth; 5)  Ending War and Reducing violence in Human Affairs; and 6) The rule of democratically Legislated, Enforceable Law for the Earth.


Some of you who are still with me are probably thinking, “but,   don’t we already have a United Nations?”  Of course we do…and it has been a big improvement over the former world organization, the League of Nations.  The U.N. has probably prevented many international conflicts and has done yeoman duty in terms of refugees and humanitarian relief.  However, it has failed in the task it was created for in San Francisco in 1945….ending war.  The U.N. has failed to live up to its potential for several reasons, most of which are related to the U.S. and other world powers unwillingness to give up a bit of their sovereignty for the common good.  The Security Council veto has prevented that organization from acting on many occasions.  The International Court of Justice is voluntary, with no means of enforcing its judgments and the General Assembly is undemocratic (India and Monaco each have equal votes),   and is  generally powerless.


The right wing in this country and abroad is paranoid about the U.N., ineffective as it is.  To them, world government conjures up thoughts of black helicopters and Hitlerism.  They feel that the war system is the natural order of life and we have to be able to fight for our freedom in a dog eat dog world.   To the victors go the spoils.   If this thinking prevails, it is only a matter of time until a nuclear confrontation lays the earth uninhabitable and humankind’s    little experiment will be over.


If the Earth Constitution or something similar were to be adapted, it would be an extension of our present democracy.  Functions that affect us locally will still be handled by local governments; state affairs will still be conducted   by our state representatives and matters dealing with national issues will still be under the jurisdiction of federal governments.  The jurisdiction of the democratic world government will be limited to relations between nations and issues such as global warming which do not   recognize   national boundaries.  Pollution created in China may end up here,  or vice-versa.


Article 109-3 of the U.N. charter calls for   a  charter  review after 10 years.  This, of course, has never happened because the permanent five (U.S., Russia, France, UK and China)   don’t   want to give up the veto.  Organizations I am involved with are working to mobilize the peace-loving nations of the world to  demand   charter review.  If we are able to make that happen, maybe the U.N. charter will be  replaced  by  the Earth Constitution or something similar  and war will become a relic of the past.


Albert Einstein said “There is no salvation for civilization or even the human race, other than the creation of a world government.”  Now is the time, before it is too late.


To find out more about the Earth Constitution, go to

May 9, 2018 [Editor's note:  "Manna" may or may not become a viable form of currency and should be considered to be speculative at this stage of its introduction to the public.  -RK]

The official initial currency of WCPA under World Legislative Act  #22:
Toward a Guaranteed Income for the People of Earth under the Earth Constitution


Some answers by Eric Stetson, Founder and Chief Executive Officer
People's Currency Foundation and Mannabase Inc.

1.  What is the main currency of 'Manna'?  Will people from other countries will convert their own currency in USD.? 
The People's Currency Foundation (non-profit which distributes Manna) aspires to have Manna listed on various currency exchanges where it may be converted into numerous major currencies in the world. Currently, it is on one exchange where it can be converted into two currencies: USD and Bitcoin (BTC). As our project and number of users continues to grow, we hope that other exchanges will add Manna and enable people to exchange it for EUR, JPY, GBP, BRL, INR, and others.

2. How will Manna work to help the poor and needy people?
Every person in the world is eligible to receive an equal amount of Manna which is deposited into their online wallet on on a weekly basis. Children are also eligible, but their wallet will be locked until they turn 18, at which time they will receive access to the Manna that has been saved in their wallet during their childhood. The People's Currency Foundation is looking for charities, NGOs, municipalities and governments to sign up impoverished or economically disadvantaged people they serve, for the distribution of Manna currency as a free benefit to help increase their economic opportunities.
This will be especially helpful for two groups of people: adults in severe poverty, for whom small amounts of money would be of significant benefit, and children whose parents cannot afford to provide them with any capital to help them get an education or other things to help them start their adult life, for whom the Manna children's savings account would be very helpful when they turn 18.

3. How Manna will solve the growing problems of wealth inequality?
If Manna becomes a widely accepted currency in the world, its equitable distribution system will gradually reduce the inequalities of wealth over time. We cannot take wealth away from those who already have it, but we can provide more wealth to those who do not, which comes from growing our money supply. In other words, the inflation of Manna currency is distributed evenly to everyone, so as the money supply grows, there is less of a gap between rich and poor.

Our nonprofit will be backing the value of Manna with donations received, and profits from our social media platform, as well as profits from other investments we may hold in the future as our organization becomes better capitalized. The currency is also backed by people's faith and trust in it, and choice to buy and use it. If its value is sufficiently backed, it can be an effective vehicle for redistribution of wealth among individuals and nations of the world.

Earth Federation News & Views 

March 23, 2018
CAN THE ZIONIST LOBBY NOW  MANAGE PRESIDENT TRUMP?  [Professor Mazin Qumsiyeh gives a Palestinian perspective, almost never seen in the controlled Western mainstream media.  He believes that Zionist extremists now have the White House, and will soon have the US in open warfare against Iran and Syria to satisfy plans for Zionist Empire ("Greater Israel").  With the appointment of right wing extremist hawk John Bolton as National Security Adviser, even MSNBC and CNN are worried about the danger of open warfare -- a repeat of the US world crime against Iraq which Bolton helped launch. -- Dr. R. Kotila, editor Earth Federation News & Views] 


My visit to Spain and Portugal is going well. I met so many nice people. From those in the science and education fields to those taking care of homeless people in the streets of Madrid, I am inspired always by the human spirit of giving and sharing. As they say in Spanish Pasaremos (like we shall overcome or it will pass). Yes, we wish politicians everywhere are on the same wavelength as the good people trying to make a living, help each other, and “first do no harm”. That contrast is made the more visible to us as we stay tuned to world affairs “thinking globally and acting locally”.

Let us first talk about thinking globally then move on to reflections on acting locally. Thinking globally one could get frustrated to see what is going on. Teenager Ahed Tamimi and her mother both given 8 months in Israeli jail for their simple acts of defiance to the genocidal Israeli apartheid policies (and have to pay thousands in “fines” and the hanging suspended sentence means they are liable to be imprisoned anytime for the simplest of acts of resistance).

Meanwhile many Israeli occupiers are claimed as “heroes” or (rarely) serve few months (but only when Israel needs to show it has “courts”) after brutally murdering Palestinians. Some who committed massacres have become Israeli leaders (Begin, Shamir, Sharon etc) or currently serve as Israeli leaders (Netanyahu and others). 100,000 Palestinians were killed since Palestine was colonized by force and renamed “Israel” and some 700,000 were kidnapped and held as political prisoners. Hundreds of villages were destroyed and today 7.5 million Palestinians are refugees or displaced people.

nder the thumb of the Zionist lobby#, the US Congress will pass a law to further punish Palestinian families and children* while continuing to reward Apartheid “Israel” with billions of our tax money. Trump fired Rex Tillerson on the orders of the Lobby then appointed neocon Pompeo as Secretary of State and Bolton as National Security Adviser. Both are Zionist “managed”. Trump then went on to appoint Gina Haskell who supports tortures and secret CIA torture prisons to head the CIA! By May 12,
Trump will dump the global deal with Iran and work to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem in violation of International law.

Zionist managed mainstream media are whipping up the masses with propaganda just like they did with the war on Iraq and Syria. The Mossad which targeted Americans and others to start wars is already preparing the next false flag operation and timing it so that the US will enter yet another war in our region on behalf of Israel. It maybe the last war for the US empire (if not the world): tax payers were loaded with $3 trillion for the war on Iraq and thousands of American soldiers paid with their lives (as well nas >1 million Iraqis) and this war will be 10 times more devastating (Iran is far stronger than Iraq was and is supported at least partially by China, Russia, Syria, and Iraq).

ike Martin Luther King had said the USA remains the “biggest purveyor of violence in the world”. The only difference is that since the 1960s, the violence has been increasingly focused on the Arab and Muslim countries because of the success of the lobby shifting US foreign policy from imperialism for the sake of the US Empire to imperialism for the sake of the Zionist Empire in a globalized world where national interests are subsidiary to globalized money interests.

Times are ominous. I think it is safe to say not only should we resist these violent trends vigorously for the sake of the future of humanity, but we should also prepare for any unfolding scenarios of devastation. We can do and are doing this in thousands of ways: by growing food locally, rethinking our ways of life and where we get our news, by developing critical thinking, by dumping chauvinistic nationalism (the racist notion of “our nation first”), by love and caring for ALL fellow human beings etc.

Here example from the USA: This is ACTING LOCALLY. As I said in the beginning I continue to be inspired by acts of kindness I see around me and via news from around the world. I gather hope from the beautiful students I met at two universities in Madrid to a Syrian refugee working in a Kitchen and helping distribute food to homeless Europeans. I see it in the Spanish students eager to learn Arabic and wanting to volunteer with us at Bethlehem University. I see it the eyes of children lighting up with curiosity and love of nature. We can and shall overcome.

n article I wrote in 2008 published by PASSIA about Palestinian options. It is still valid: “Cowardice asks the question - is it safe? Expediency asks the question - is it politic? Vanity asks the question - is it popular? But conscience asks the question - is it right? And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right.”

Action: ell Adidas it is No Fair Play on Stolen Land #Al Jazeera has been threatened by members of Congress because of the investigation they conducted about the lobbying of AIPAC for Israel. Robert Fisk wonders if we will ever see the results of this investigation. *

Stay Human Mazin Qumsiyeh A bedouin in cyberspace, a villager at home Professor, Founder, and (volunteer) Director Palestine Museum of Natural History Palestine Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability Bethlehem University Occupied Palestine

From Mazin Qumsiyeh's Blog (March, 2018):
Zionist Lobby Dictates US Foreign Policy to Support Israeli World Crimes
The last fig leaf has fallen also off of the lie of a “peace process” supposedly led by the US government which in turn has a foreign policy dictated by the Zionist lobby. It is the last fig leaf that protected the Arab leaders from Riyad to Ramalllah who helped Israel get away with ethnic cleansing, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. It is the last fig leaf that protected the hypocritical Western Leaders from Sydney to Berlin to London to Washington who speak of International law and did everything in their power to physically support and fund an apartheid state that violates just about every provision of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights as well as the Fourth Geneva Convention and countless UN resolutions (both UN security council and general assembly resolutions). It even violates the provisions of Israel’s own admission to the UN and should have long been expelled from the UN.

Earth Federation News & Views      

Dateline:  San Francisco,  March 14, 2018.  Would US troops die for Israel?
[Editor's note:  Unfortunately the United Nations cannot prevent Israel or the U.S. from expanding the illegal war against Syria.  The UN, due to its defective Charter, lacks the tools it needs to intervene effectively.  The UN should turn to the Earth Constitution.  It would have the missing governing structure needed to prevent the carnage and suffering that the Middle East endures.  We can only hope that Israel does not also decide to attack Iran -- and use a "shock and awe"  traumatic first strike strategy with tactical nuclear weapons, confident that Trump's American military will back them up. - R. Kotila, Ph.D.]

US Commander: ‘US Troops Prepared to Die for Israel’ in War Against Syria, Hezbollah

Operation Juniper Cobra is not a routine exercise; it is a portent of a potentially devastating war against Syria, Hezbollah and Gaza for which Israel is actively preparing — a war likely to erupt within the coming months.

In-depth Report: SYRIA

Featured image: Soldiers from the U.S. Army and the Israel Defense Force (IDF carry a litter with a mock patient during a mass casualty training as part of the combined missile defense exercise known as Juniper Cobra 18, Feb. 28, 2018. (U.S. Navy photo)

Last Sunday, the largest joint military exercise between the United States and Israel began with little fanfare. The war game, dubbed “Operation Juniper Cobra,” has been a regular occurrence for years, though it has consistently grown in size and scope. Now, however, this year’s 12-day exercise brings a portent of conflict unlike those of its predecessors.

Previous reports on the operation suggested that, like prior incarnations of the same exercise, the focus would be on improving Israeli defenses.

“Juniper Cobra 2018 is another step in improving the readiness of the IDF [Israeli Defense Forces] and the IAF [Israeli Air Force] in particular to enhance their operational capabilities in facing the threat posed by high-trajectory missiles,” Brig. Gen. Zvika Haimovitch, the IDF’s Aerial Defense Division head, told the Jerusalem Post.

However, this year’s “Juniper Cobra” is unique for several reasons. The Post reported on Thursday that the drill, set to end on March 15, was not only the largest joint U.S.-Israeli air defense exercise to ever happen but it was also simulating a battle “on three fronts.” In other words, Israel and the U.S. are jointly simulating a war with Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine – namely, the Gaza strip – simultaneously.

What makes this last part so concerning are Israel’s recent statements and other preparations for war with all three nations, making “Juniper Cobra” anything but a “routine” drill. It is instead yet another preparation for a massive regional conflict, suggesting that such a conflict could be only a matter of months away.

As MintPress recently reported, Israeli officials recently told a bipartisan pair of U.S. Senators that it needed “ammunition, ammunition, ammunition” for a war against Hezbollah in Lebanon — a war that will expressly target Lebanese civilians and civilian infrastructure, such as hospitals, schools, and apartment buildings.

The alleged motive for the invasion is the presence of Iranian rocket factories. However, this allegation is based solely on the claims of an anonymous deputy serving in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard and was first reported on by a Kuwaiti newspaper known to publish stories planted by the Israeli government.

In addition, Israel has been laying the groundwork for an invasion of Syria since last year and is largely responsible for the current conflict in Syria that has raged on for seven years. Israel’s current push to invade Syria is also based on flimsy evidence suggesting that Iran is establishing bases in Syria to target Israel.

Israel has also been preparing for a conflict on the embattled Gaza strip, which – owing to the effects of Israel’s illegal blockade and the devastation wrought by past wars – is set to be entirely uninhabitable by 2020. Reports have quoted officials of the Palestinian resistance group Hamas, which governs the Gaza strip, as saying that they place the chances of a new war with Israel in 2018 “at 95 percent” and that war games, like Operation Juniper Cobra, were likely to be used to plan or even initiate such a conflict. This concern was echoed by IDF Chief of Staff Gadi Eizenkot, who stated that another Israeli invasion of Gaza, home to 1.8 million people, was “likely” to occur this year. Eizenkot ironically framed the imminent invasion as a way to “prevent a humanitarian collapse” in Gaza.

U.S. lights match, prepares troops

US Israeli troops deploy a Patriot missile defense battery during the 2018 Juniper Cobra air defense exercise in March 2018. (Israel Defense Forces)

US and Israeli troops deploy a Patriot missile defense battery during the 2018 Juniper Cobra air defense exercise in March 2018. (Source: Israel Defense Forces)

Such a war is likely to be ignited by the unrest destined to follow the U.S.’ imminent move of its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The move, set to take place in May, led Hamas to call for a third intifada, or uprising, in response to the U.S.’ unilateral decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in defiance of the international consensus.

Beyond the fact that Israel is preparing to go to war with several countries simultaneously is the fact that U.S. ground troops are now “prepared to die for the Jewish state,” according to U.S. Third Air Force Commander Lt. Gen. Richard Clark.

“We are ready to commit to the defense of Israel and anytime we get involved in a kinetic fight there is always the risk that there will be casualties. But we accept that, as in every conflict we train for and enter, there is always that possibility,” Clark told the Post.

However, more troubling than the fact that U.S. troops stand ready to die at Israel’s behest was Clark’s assertion that Haimovitch would “probably” have the last word as to whether U.S. forces would join the IDF during war time. In other words, the IDF will decide whether or not U.S. troops become embroiled in the regional war for which Israel is preparing, not the United States. Indeed, Haimovitch buoyed Clark’s words, stating that:

“I am sure once the order comes we will find here U.S. troops on the ground to be part of our deployment and team to defend the state of Israel.”

Operation Juniper Cobra is not a routine exercise; it is a portent of a potentially devastating war for which Israel is actively preparing, a war likely to erupt within the coming months. In addition to overtly targeting civilians, these preparations for war — as Juniper Cobra shows — directly involve the United States military and give the war-bent Israeli government the power to decide whether or not American troops will be involved and to what extent. This is a devastating giveaway of national sovereignty by U.S. President Donald Trump.

While the potential involvement of the U.S. forces in such a war is being framed as limited in scope, there is no indication that such a war will be so in practice. Indeed, the U.S. is currently occupying 25 percent of Syria and the Trump administration has economically attacked Palestinians living in Gaza by withdrawing crucial aid, as well as Hezbollah by enforcing new sanctions against the group. Furthermore, Israel’s nuclear arsenal and the fact that Iran — and even Russia — could become involved in such a conflict means that it could quickly spiral out of control.

*Whitney Webb is a staff writer for MintPress News who has written for several news organizations in both English and Spanish; her stories have been featured on ZeroHedge, the Anti-Media, and 21st Century Wire among others. She currently lives in Southern Chile.

OPINION - Earth Federation News & Views
March 7, 2018

Are Netanyahu and Trump Going To Start A War Against Iran?
Trump reversed his campaign pledge to put America First by reducing our imperial profile.  But instead of
cutting back on our interventions for regime change, he has continued the failed pro-Israel, Neocon policies of
his predecessors.
A quick perusal of  the headlines shows that even as I write this, Trump and Bibi have reinforced their
public bromance with the President apparently endorsing everything the Israeli Lobby wants regarding
Jerusalem, Syria, settlements and Iran.  Other than Jared Kushner losing his top security clearance, there
is little evidence that Trump is doing much to constrain the Israeli Lobby's hold on the Capital.
With Bibi in town to attend the annual AIPAC pow wow, we once again see the Israeli Prime Minister making
outlandish claims about Iran's threat to the world while predicting Trump will scrap the 5 + 1 nuke deal.
Most likely to happen is what Lawrence Wilkerson and I have both written:  That the two beleaguered leaders will start a war with Iran to divert attention away from their scandals.
It is going to take much more to awaken our distracted and insouciant American public to shed the mantle of
domination we currently see manifesting itself today.  Maybe if Bibi is frog-marched off to jail and/or Trump is
impeached or dispatched from the White House we will see a change. 
Until then, it looks to this observer that the Trump/Kusner/Bibi Alliance underwritten by Sheldon Adelson and
manned by countless loyal Neocons will perpetuate the imperial ways of 21st Century America.
by Rich Scheck

November 16, 2017
A Courageous Israeli Speaks Out
by Rick Sterling

On October 6, 2017 there was a presentation in Lafayette California featuring the Israeli-American Miko Peled.  The event was sponsored by Mt Diablo Peace & Justice Center (MDPJC) with co-sponsorship by Jewish Voice for Peace and others.

What Miko Peled says is seldom heard by Americans.

Miko was born in Jerusalem and comes from a famous Israeli family. His grandfather was one of the signers of the Israeli founding documents. His father was a soldier in the war which led to the creation of Israel and later a senior Army general during the 1967 war. Adding to the power of his voice, one of Miko’s nieces was killed in a suicide bombing attack. Miko Peled is author of the acclaimed book The General’s Son: Journey of an Israeli in Palestine.

In contrast with what one might expect, Miko Peled is a voice of sharp criticism of Israel and Israeli policies. He does not mince his words. Israel is a “settler colonial state” and Israel does NOT have a “right to exist” as an apartheid state with preferential treatment based on ethnicity.

Miko does not speak in the abstract; he gives specific examples to demonstrate what he says. Palestinians in the West Bank have no consistent running water while settlers enjoy unlimited drinking water plus swimming pools and water for green lawns. The situation in Gaza is even worse. The two million residents of the tiny Gaza strip endure horrific conditions. Babies with medical conditions die while just a few miles away, Israeli babies with the same conditions will live.

Peled does not limit his criticism to the “Occupied Territories”. He says all of the state should be called Palestine with equal rights and opportunities for all. Peled pokes fun at the claims that Jews anywhere have a “right to return” because of a supposed 2000 year old claim and entitlement. These claims are based on the Old Testament not scientific history. In contrast with the myth, most Israeli citizens have zero DNA connection to the region. Peled humorously points to the irony of zionists who claim a 2000 year old “right” to the land as they deny and denigrate the rights and claims of Palestinians who were expelled in 1948 and after. As Peled explains, most Israelis are quick to tell Palestinians to “get over it” despite the fact that Palestinian claims are well documented and the expulsion was only 70 years ago not 2000. Unknown to most Americans, about half a million Palestinians languish in Lebanon, waiting for the time when they return to their villages in Palestine from which they were expelled in 1948 and after. The actual history of those events has been clearly documented by the Israeli historian Ilan Pappe.

Peled thinks that the situation is better now that the pretense of a “two state solution” is openly dismissed by US President Trump and Israeli PM Netanyahu. There are two paths: the current situation of supremacist democracy for Jews only with continuing occupation and oppression for the Palestinians or democracy for all. While acknowledging the unpopularity of equality for most Israelis today, Miko Peled recalls how quickly the change happened in South Africa. He says if they could overcome apartheid in South Africa, why is this not possible in Israel/Palestine?

In the 1980’s and early 90’s, the international Boycott Apartheid campaign helped to end open racism in South Africa. Around the world there is a similar peaceful and non-violent campaign pressing for the end of open racism in Israel.  It’s called “BDS” for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions. The goal is to pressure Israel to abandon its apartheid policies just as South Africa did. Making clear his own stand, Miko Peled wore a large BDS button on his lapel. For those who mistakenly believe that Israel is a progressive force internationally, the reality is that Israel was one of apartheid South Africa’s closest allies.

For taking the stance he does, and especially because of his family roots, Miko Peled has been vilified and threatened. It takes great courage to follow his beliefs as he has. His family is apparently with him. In his book he describes how his mother refused to take furniture or property of Palestinians who had been expelled from Jerusalem in 1967, as many other prominent Jewish families were doing. He describes his father’s evolution from military general to an advocate for peace and respect for Palestinians. And he describes the reaction of his sister and how she blamed Netanyahu and racist policies for the death of her daughter. Miko Peled demonstrates courage and integrity.  Through his writing and speeches he exposes racist policies in Israel and the US. He seeks a better future even if it sometimes appears hopeless and provokes slander and personal threats against himself.

Miko Peled’s book is published by Just World Books. A video of his Lafayette presentation, including the introduction by St Mary’s College Professor Hisham Ahmed, is posted at the Mt Diablo Peace & Justice Center website.
[This article first published October 10, 2017 in]

Rick Sterling is an investigative journalist. He lives in the SF Bay Area and can be contacted at 
October 17, 2017 

Editor's message to President Trump and to world federalists: It is tempting for world federalists to overlook President Trump's recent authoritarian speech to the United Nations. Yet for a leader of a powerful nation like the U.S. to openly threaten war goes against everything world federalists stand for. We don't need jingoism, Mr. President. World federalists want a "new United Nations" for a reason: To provide an effective global governing structure where conflicts can be resolved peacefully by means of going to Court, or going to a democratically elected World Parliament. 

And excuse me, Mr. President. It should be "World first," not "America first." 

-- R. Kotila, Ph.D.

United Nations – and the Monster in the Room

By Peter Koenig Global Research, September 23, 2017 Region: USA Theme: United Nations

There are no words, other than Monster, not even human monster, that can describe Trump’s appearance before the UN General Assembly last Tuesday, 19 September.

It’s of no use to go through details of the insults he yelled at the word – many others have explained and analyzed that already – and done it well – remains to say that what Trump demonstrated with threats of total devastation of North Korea, war against Iran, total asphyxiation of Venezuela, regime change in Syria – and more – is sheer criminal, war criminal behavior.

Pledging for respect of nations’ sovereignty, yet threatening the world at large – except for Israel -with total annihilation if it doesn’t follow Washington’s orders, is pure hypocrisy; it has never been expressed as desperately before the entire UN body of nations as did Trump last Monday. While some of his predecessors have not talked kindly to this league of nations, expressing threats, lies and humiliations, the extent of Trump’s atrocious behavior has no precedent in the history of the UN.

The ongoing US indiscriminate killing around the globe – tens of millions of people in the last 70 years alone – plus these ferocious, insane threats, and economic strangulations through illegal sanctions, are ripe for a new Nuremburg type tribunal

It is a typical and dangerous conduct for a dying beast. Lashing out at its surroundings, at the world, as it were – for intimidation, disgrace and foremost to pull as many as possible with the dying monster into its self-made grave.

But the burning question that we have to ask ourselves, is this: Why did almost nobody, safe for Iran and North Korea and perhaps one or the other country representative walk out? 

Why did of the more than 180 nations who wish and desire the final demise of this murderous empire, not dare to exit the room of the Monster, the General Assembly, and let Trump speak and yell atrocities to empty walls and to himself?

The New York Times reports that “world leaders were stoic and quiet, barely reacting to his remarks about their countries.”

Why? Out of fear? What fear? – Could and would this military dictatorship, run by “Mad Dog” et al, a top brass military junta, destroy the world as we know it? – I don’t think so.

Is it for the money, because the US is currently footing almost a quarter of the UN budget and is threatening to withdraw her funding, if the UN is not “restructured”, meaning, to become a total puppet of Washington and its deep state? – I don’t think so. Indeed, by 22 September 2017, the US of A had not paid her dues.

Every halfway sane nation knows that the UN already today is barely more than a stooge to Washington, so are most of the UN specialized agencies and international courts that were once created with good intentions, I hope to believe.

So, then why?

Wouldn’t walking out have been a clear act of world solidarity, of a world that stands for peace and not for eternal war, not for a weapons and military based economy, but one that thrives on peace, on people’s development and wellbeing? 

A new UN body, à la League of Nations after WWI that stands for peace, could be forged without the rogue nations, such as the United States and Monsters such as Trump. And this at a cost much lower than the current official UN budget of US$ 5.4 Billion. A lot of deadwood overhead could be cut.

Or, is it that almost the entire world, its leaders, have become psychopaths, succumbing to the Stockholm syndrome? – They seek the protection of their very murderer. How sick has our western civilization become? The result of neoliberalism – a ‘modern’ form of fascism that makes people blindly obeying their butcher, confronting their own demise?

It’s high time that we wake up. Better late than never. And the Never is when we have been swallowed by the deadly abyss. Before that very moment, we still have a chance to resist.

Open your eyes and ears and walk away from and boycott Monsters like Trump, and the handlers that have chosen their multi-billionaire bully to frighten the world into submission.

Wake up! And walk out a way – forging a peace solidarity!

Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a former World Bank staff and worked extensively around the world in the fields of environment and water resources. He lectures at universities in the US, Europe and South America. He writes regularly for Global Research, ICH, RT, Sputnik, PressTV, The 4th Media (China), TeleSUR, The Vineyard of The Saker Blog, and other internet sites. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on facts and on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is also a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.

The original source of this article is Global Research Copyright © Peter Koenig, Global Research, 2017
Beyond Trump and Nukes: Unmaking War, Remaking Men
September 20, 2017   Reader Supported News

San Francisco -- When President Trump promises that the threats by North Korea's Kim Jong Un "will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen,” many of us believe that Trump is willing to order a nuclear attack.

A president who takes pride in making violent threats and appears willing to risk a nuclear war raises an important question as to the president’s psychiatric status, and further brings up the question of what is wrong with the world’s geopolitical system that allows this type of nightmarish endangerment?

While some pundits fret over a president who appears mentally unstable and willing to start a nuclear war, there are others who are thrilled that the president is being “strong.”

New York Times reporter Richard Fausset captures conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh’s excitement over finally having a “real man” as president. “We don’t have a pajama boy who wears mom jeans who can barely throw a baseball, a first pitch, at a Nationals game, as president," Rush gushes sarcastically. "We have somebody out there who's no-nonsense, who's not going to take this!"

Trump as a macho warrior standing up against North Korea and making America great again?  What’s wrong with this picture?

What if Trump’s "machismo" is a psychological trait which vastly increases the likelihood that he will impulsively order a nuclear strike to prove to a defiant opponent that he (the U.S.) is “the boss”?  Sociologist Kathleen Barry in “Unmaking War, Remaking Men” concludes that men, due to socialization, are susceptible to the "masculinity of war” which leads to psychopathic behaviors like some see in the Trump presidency.

Trump’s many threats to use military violence puts the psychology of boastful “machismo” on full display, a trait that, in combination with other psychiatric symptoms, could lead to new wars like his recent threats to use military force against Venezuela.

Psychiatric symptoms galore

A group of mental health experts in April told a conference at Yale University’s School of Medicine that they believe President Trump is paranoid and delusional, and suffers a “dangerous mental illness.”  Some pundits describe the president as narcissistic and lacking empathy, while others find him to be hostile, bigoted, emotionally unstable, a pathological liar, and “deranged.”

Could it get worse?  Yes.

Trump displays behaviors found in psychopaths, the most dangerous type of antisocial personality disorder known to psychiatry. A psychopathic personality disorder refers to an extreme lack of conscience.  Reporter Mehdi Hasan for The Intercept (8/9/17) quotes Trump’s strategy for defeating ISIS:  “Bomb the shit out of ‘em” and “take out their families.”

“Remorseless killing” is a hallmark of the ultimate psychopath.  While sociopaths may lie, cheat, steal, or even kill, extreme psychopaths are capable of the same and more, of remorseless mass murder.  What if the President becomes obsessed with the idea of using his nuclear arsenal to show the world he isn’t just empty talk (isn’t weak).

Lack of Global Conscience

Psychopaths may easily fool people as to their true nature since they can seem to be normal – just like everybody else, but sometimes a little over the top. President Trump reveals a stunning lack of Global Conscience.

Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Environmental Accords illustrates his contempt for the world community, much as does his apparent willingness to commit genocide if he orders a nuclear first strike against North Korea. The radioactive victims would include American soldiers and millions living in Seoul only 30 miles from North Korea, not to mention the nearby people of Japan and on the eastern coasts of China and Russia.

A threat of genocide would suggest that emergency measures may be necessary to prevent the Trump and Kim confrontation from erupting into war. Can the world community rely on the military generals to refuse if Trump orders a surprise first strike nuclear attack?

Should Congress intervene and take the nuclear missile launch codes away from the President, or apply the 25th Amendment to remove an unfit President as suggested by John Cassidy in the New Yorker (8/14/17)?

Manhood gone awry

A key lesson to remember is that "leaders in the White House and around the world" become potentially "remorseless killers" because "Every society makes men's readiness to fight in combat a matter of their manhood."

Historian Alexander DeConde examines how “one U.S. president after another took the military into unnecessary wars,” and concludes in his study of Presidential Machismo that presidential power over the military allows leaders to prove their virility.  Few presidents, he concludes, have been able to resist the temptation to use the military machine at their disposal to exalt themselves in the role of warrior.

War will not be unmade without remaking masculinity.  “Core masculinity” is not biological, but is taught by society.  A boy learns to be tough, aggressive, and unfeeling. As a man the state is preparing him for potential combat, part of society’s expectation and requirements of manhood.

World peace will require abandoning traditional core masculinity with its violent standards of manhood.

Why a "new UN" is needed

We know that changing the macho culture alone will not be enough to stop war. We urgently need geopolitical change. At the global level there is no law and order, no global sheriff to insure the peace.  Leaders from powerful countries are above the law.

When the world is governed by unbounded psychopathy, it is a risk that America and the world community should not accept.  A mentally ill leader may distort reality, but a psychopath is willing to take down the whole world.

Psychopaths do not respond to reason, love, or conscience.

The United Nations is needed in the event that a country is held hostage by a psychopathic leader.  But the UN lacks the tools to intervene significantly, its hands tied by the flawed UN Charter.

The UN cannot remove Trump (or Kim) from office even if they represent an imminent danger. The UN cannot protect us from nuclear war. It is sidelined when it counts the most.

The UN’s deficiencies are being addressed by Democratic World Federalists in a strategy called THE SAN FRANCISCO PROMISE.  An initial step is a demand that the UN General Assembly review the UN Charter which opens the door for the possibility of a “new UN.”

The World Constitution and Parliament Association’s Constitution for the Federation of Earth (aka "Earth Constitution")  can serve as the “gold standard” for a new Charter, transforming the UN into a democratic world federal union with enforceable world law, and given the tools needed to eliminate nuclear weapons and end war itself.

Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

Beware Europe: American Empire Is Rapidly Imploding!

July 31, 2017
San Francisco

Dear friends in the European Parliament & fellow peace activists,
Please read carefully the following analysis by an American journalist familiar with the geopolitical undercurrents swirling against Russia and
impacting Europe. Will the EU be able to resist the economic sanctions imposed by the American Congress against Russia which could be
interpreted as an act of (economic) war? 
We are witnessing in the USA an intensive propaganda campaign to give the (false) impression that Russia is an "enemy." With an
unpredictable President Trump, Europe must be cautious. Trump is naive about false flag operations (such as Gladio III), if activated by the
Deep State, could trick Trump into impulsively going to war.
Best regards,
Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

Editor, Earth Federation News & Views at

The American Empire Is Rapidly Imploding!

Posted on July 30, 2017 by State of the Nation 

Yelm, WA
July 30, 2017

by Rich Scheck

A brief review of the latest foreign policy developments demonstrates how rapidly the US Empire is coming apart at the seams.

With an Administration in Washington that is run by extreme nationalists and former military men along with a belligerent foreign policy that threatens war and more war across the planet, the economically weak US government has little prospect of avoiding WWIII much less staving off civil unrest at home.

Fed by massive MSM (main stream media) propaganda such as recently appeared on PBS, the American public is being conditioned to see Russia as its enemy:

Sterling’s excellent analysis presumes the possibility that rational minds will prevail and war with Russia can be averted. That is extremely unlikely considering that the US empire is rapidly imploding under the Trump Administration which pays lip-service to fighting theDeep State but which is a more nationalistic
version of it.

The American public is brain-dead and addicted to sports, consumerism and worse. Trump has made the mess he inherited worse with his misguided leadership. His selection of Cabinet members was dominated by hawks and hacks who are unable to deliver on his campaign rhetoric because they see the need to rely on the failed doctrine of projecting military force instead of fostering economic growth through cooperation with Russia and China:

Instead we see an escalation of tensions in all the key trouble spots:
North Korea:

The apparent retreat in Syria is suspect because of our continuing support of the Kurds and is subject to a quick reversal at the behest of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Turkey or any of the other players in that ongoing war.

The collapse of the unipolar world and Pax Americana is upon us. Efforts to perpetuate America’s imperial foreign policy under-girded by a criminal mentality that violates the spirit and intent of the Nuremberg Doctrine is being resisted across the planet.

Even the EU is threatening to abandon its (former?) ally in response to the latest sanctions outrage. We have returned to a delicate historical moment similar to August, 1914 and September, 1939 that preceded the start of the two previous world wars. With such poor leadership at the helm of the America’s Ship of State, the greater likelihood is that we will soon see a repeat of what has gone before.

The Rubiks solver calculates the rotations to sove the unsolvable cube.

June 27, 2017

The Dinosaur Party and Dangerous “Useless Eaters”

Roger Kotila, Ph.D.


President Trump and Republican Speaker of the House Paul Ryan have submitted a proposed 2018 budget

which adds $50 billion to the Pentagon’s already bloated war budget, while calling for catastrophic funding

cuts in health care which could impact those with medical problems, the disabled, the poor, and the

working poor. 


The budget opens the door for tax reductions which greatly benefit the rich.  E.J. Dionne, Jr. in the San

Francisco Chronicle (6/26/17) writes “About $33 billion of this would go to tax cuts conservatively

averaging $7 million every year to each of the 400 highest-income families in the country.”


While President Trump gives the Pentagon’s war machine extra billions and withdraws the U.S. from the

Paris Climate Accords, Speaker Ryan appears determined to reduce the population of those who, like in

Hitler’s Nazi Germany, are seen as “useless eaters.”  


Trump’s withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords by itself earns the Republican Party a new title – the

Dinosaur Party, as it risks large scale deaths from weather extremes.


But climate change denial isn’t the only dinosaur policy.  The budget continues to lavishly fund the

National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) Life Extinction Program (LEP), a plan whose aim is to

“modernize” our nuclear weapons systems but is likely to cause a nuclear arms race.    


Reducing access to health care services can be viewed as an indirect form of extinction policy, aimed at the

needy.  The goal appears disturbingly similar to when Hitler ordered the extermination of adults or children

unable to function independently because of disabilities or significant medical conditions.  


For the Nazis, such folks were deemed unproductive “useless eaters” – “life unworthy of life” (Wikipedia,

“Useless Eaters”).  In a Salon article by Chauncey DeVega (3/20/17) the subtitle reads: “Trump’s budget

proposes many ways to punish the poor.  It’s a new version of the Nazi urge to purge “parasites.”    


With Speaker Ryan involved, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised since he admired greatly the ideas of the

author of “Atlas Shrugged,” Ayn Rand who advocated individual selfishness over the good of the

community, and especially held contempt for the weak and the poor. 


For Ryan, dreams for an Ayn Rand world of personal selfishness and greed may finally come true.  Useless

eaters, Paul Ryan might explain in the best Ayn Rand tradition, are “takers.”  They don't deserve the

government's help.  It only makes them more dependent.   


But Ryan and the Republicans have it wrong.  The disabled, the sick, the poor, are not to be cast off as

useless eaters, but seen and valued as members of someone’s family to be loved and cared for.    


Finding the real useless eaters

The real “useless eaters” are the financially overfed beneficiaries of the military/industrial complex like

Lockheed Martin Corp. the prime contractor for the F-35, a new fighter jet that can carry a B61-12 nuclear



The F-35 has been described as the most expensive military program in Pentagon history (Hartung, Center

for International Policy).  Trillions of dollars are happily given for this aircraft, the fighter plane that,

according to objective experts, can't fight or fly right.  It's a lemon.  Journalist Paul Barrett asks “Is the F-35

a Trillion Dollar Mistake?” (4/4/17,


The total military-related part of the 2018 U.S. budget feeds absurd amounts of taxpayer cash to what

should be seen as the real “useless eaters” – such as the LEP nuclear attack program which includes the

F-35, B-21, B61-12, and the W80-4.  The money for these diabolical weapons should go for health care and

education, not death and destruction.


The Republican budget, as noted earlier, continues to fund the NNSA’s euphemistically labeled Life

Extension Program.  The LEP continues a 30 year plan started under President Obama to spend a trillion

dollars (!) to “modernize” our nuclear warheads, bombs, and delivery systems. 


In reality, the LEP is a Life Extinction Program.


The LEP features refined ways to end the world with tactical nuclear bombs (B61-12) to be deployed in

Europe, and nuclear warheads (W80-4) for cruise missiles – the latter a “modernized” nuclear warhead

considered by some experts to be a first strike weapon. 


The B-21 stealth bomber built by Northrop Grumman is another useless eater of taxpayer money which can

carry nukes to end the world.  The B-21 is so expensive that its estimated cost was kept secret by Congress. 

Lately, it is believed that the cost is upwards of $58 billion (The Defense Monitor, Sept., 2016).


Let’s hope and pray that a boastful President Trump doesn’t get an itchy trigger finger and becomes

overcome by a mood to remind the world that America is “exceptional” and “can’t be messed with!” and

impulsively orders a nuclear first strike.


Having a brash President with access to a lethally armed nuclear war machine in an aggressive nation like

the U.S., and who is also a climate change denier, is not a combination that bodes well for the homeland or

the world.    


Add it up, and it feels appropriate to refer to the present Republican Party as the “Dinosaur” Party.  It is a

Party whose budget will make sure that people who need help won't get it -- not food stamps, not Medicaid,

not wheels on meals.  Instead, the money will go to the unproductive rich and its ever more dangerous

military/industrial complex.   


Senator Dianne Feinstein has been quoted to say that “…Congress shouldn’t fund dangerous new weapons

designed to fight unwinnable nuclear wars.” (Citizen’s Watch, Spring 2017)


Seeking an end to the danger of a nuclear nightmare

Recognizing that nuclear militarism is a dead end, the peace loving nations at the United Nations are

currently seeking to ban nuclear weapons.  Yet the Dinosaur Party, as well as many corporate Democrats,

have yet to get the message.


The same shameful opposition can be said for the permanent 5 veto members of the UN Security Council –

France, Great Britain, Russia, China, and the U.S. -- all of whom are attempting to stop the UN from

passing a ban on nukes.


But the UN, no matter how well intentioned, lacks the tools needed to successfully end the dangers of life

extinction. The UN Charter itself lacks provisions to protect human rights, or enforce treaties or

international law.  As a result, aggressive nations may simply ignore the ban. 


The Earth Constitution could provide the needed answers for a “new UN.”  The EC offers a blueprint to

transform the World System into one capable of preventing the danger of life extinction, and is designed to

replace the inadequate UN Charter.    


The second “Building the World Parliament” conference under the Earth Constitution meets in

Delhi, India in December, 2017 and will be open to interested activists and the public.     

June 7, 2017
                         World Constitution and Parliament Association                      
For more information contact:    
(WCPA was founded in 1958 by Margaret and Philip Isely)
The Coming Climate Collapse

The Paris Climate Accord is a treaty of sovereign nation-states. “Sovereign” in this context means that they recognize no enforceable law above
themselves. It means that the nations of the world insist that their citizens must obey their internal laws, but they themselves refuse to live
under the rule of enforceable law. This contradiction is destroying our planetary climate and may lead to our extinction.

The first U.N. sponsored environmental conference was as early as 1972. Twenty years later global alarm about the disintegrating environment
resulted in the famous 1992 Rio de Janeiro Conference that attracted scientists and leaders from around the world. Even at that time, there
was an overwhelming consensus among scientists worldwide concerning the life-threatening crisis of human-caused climate change. It was ten
years later, in 2002, that the U.N. sponsored another huge climate conference in Johannesburg, South Africa. Despite this scientific consensus,
there was general agreement that the Rio climate accord, called “Agenda 21,” was a complete failure.

The U.N. then set the “Millennium Development Goals,” stating that the unsustainable global economy must be transformed by 2015. The
consensus in 2015 was again one of failure. So the U.N. with much fanfare launched a new set of 15 year goals called the “Sustainable
Development Goals.” These goals give the year 2030 as the deadline for achieving serious reductions in carbon and other emissions. These
goals were also largely included in the Paris Climate Accords, signed by some 190 nations.

Does any thoughtful person seriously believe these goals will be achieved? “Sovereign” nations, recognizing no enforceable law above
themselves, can only cooperate by entering into voluntary, unenforceable treaties, like the Paris Accord. Yet every sovereign nation operates on
the basis of its own perceived economic and military self-interest.

If a thriving capitalist economy conflicts with attaining the sustainable development goals, no nation will pursue these. If nations fail to achieve
these goals by the year 2030, no serious consequences follow for these nations or their leaders. The Paris accords are voluntary and
unenforceable. Under the present system the climate will inevitably collapse, and within a few decades may no longer support human life.

In Brazil, greedy politicians who are also businessmen have been trying to push through their Parliament a bill allowing them to build some 40
dams on the Tapajos River and its tributaries and thereby flood some 1000 square miles of Amazon jungle. The Amazon jungle, as every
thoughtful person knows, is “the lungs of the Earth.” What right does Brazil have to destroy the lungs of the Earth? These lungs belong to the
planet and to
humankind. Yet under the sovereign nation system, Brazil, like every other major country, has the power to destroy us all.

Similarly, the U.S. recently withdrew from the Paris Climate Accord, thereby sealing the fate of the entire world’s effort to prevent climate
collapse. As with Brazil, the U.S. is a sovereign nation and participation in this
agreement is voluntary, just as compliance with the agreement is
voluntary. Under this system, there is little
hope for a decent human future.

The Constitution for the Federation of Earth (aka "Earth Constitution) is dedicated to creating a sustainable planetary system from
beginning to end. To solve the problem of climate collapse, an integrated and comprehensive approach is
necessary. For example, global
poverty must be eliminated along with global militarism if we are to achieve
sustainability. (The U.N. Sustainable Development Goals only
recognize poverty as a problem, not militarism.)
Today, half the world’s population cook their food with wood and charcoal, which is a major
cause of
deforestation and climate collapse.

Similarly, militarism is the global industry most environmentally destructive. It not only pours trillions of U.S. dollars down a toilet that should
be used for environmental protection and conversion, but the use of these
bombs, shells, and missiles is environmentally devastating, and the
very manufacture of these horrific
weapons produces millions of tons of poisonous toxic waste every year.

Every nation operates from its own perceived self-interest, which is not the interest of the planet or future generations. Only uniting the Earth
under the Earth Constitution can create an integrated and comprehensive
system that can save our planet. The withdrawal of the U.S. from
the Paris Accord only underlines this point.
Withdrawal or no withdrawal is not the issue.

The central issue is whether we can unite to solve our global problems. The Paris Accord is based on a political fragmentation of our planet that
makes effective action impossible. Uniting under the Earth Constitution will
protect the internal sovereignty of every nation while at the
same time establishing the rule of enforceable
law over all the nations. For all these reasons, ratification of the Earth Constitution is our
central hope. We
must act now to unite the nations and protect our common human future.

On behalf of the World Parliament and the Earth Constitution,

From the Executive Council of WCPA:

Dr. Glen T. Martin President
Swami Agnivesh, WCPA Distinguished Advisor
Dr. Roger Kotila, WCPA Vice-President
Guruji Arun Kumar, WCPA Distinguished Advisor

Fri, May 26, 2017 
Statement in Response to President Trump’s World Tour, May 2017

The Constitution for the Federation of Earth
World Parliament

Operating in 14 sessions of the Provisional World Parliament to date in locations around the world
Statement in Response to President Trump’s World Tour,   May 2017

On behalf of the World Parliament, with its many esteemed delegates and concerned citizens from around the world, we declare that a world tour by the President of the most powerful nation on Earth should promote real solutions to our terrible global problems of war, poverty, and environmental collapse.
Instead, we find President Trump speaking transparent lies and empty platitudes not only to Arab and Jewish dictators but to dozens of leaders from nations around the world. Behind these platitudes is the hypocrisy and terror of the present world system that continues war, human misery, and environmental devastation in countries everywhere such as Yemen, Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria.
President Trump transparently promotes the war-system in the world and the uncontrolled capitalist trade system of wealth and power. He has secured a 350 billion dollar weapons deal with Saudi Arabia and another 240 billion dollars in trade deals. The recent terrible suicide bombing in Manchester, England, is a direct consequence of the war-system promoted by the U.S., Great Britain, and their allies. The so-called “security” systems of nearly all nations that destroy freedom and only increase human misery are also a direct consequence of their war-system.
We need world leaders who promote the rule of democratically legislated law on Earth. We need leaders who promote peace, justice, human flourishing, and environmental integrity. Any world leader who truly leads will affirm the need to empower the World Parliament under the Earth Constitution as only effective means by which human beings from around our planet can solve our global problems. The World Parliament seeks endorsement for our declaration from all those showing true leadership. We demand leadership with integrity and vision from everyone who truly seeks peace among the nations and peoples of the Earth.
On behalf of the World Parliament:
Dr. Glen T. Martin, President of the Parliament and the World Constitution and Parliament Assoc. (WCPA)
Swami Agnivesh, Distinguished Advisor, WCPA
Rev. Laura George, J.D., International Advisory Board, WCPA
Dr. Roger Kotila, Vice-President, WCPA
Dr. Vijaya Murthy, International Advisory Board, WCPA
25 May 2017

February 10, 2017
Jerusalem For All
Born in the Palestinian city of El-Bireh (presently under Israeli Military and Settlers Occupation). Immigrated to the US in
62. After graduating from high school in Gary, Indiana was drafte...Show More
This article comes from Veterans Today. Jerusalem for all? A wonderful vision if only the United Nations had the tools to
make it happen. But Mr. Jadallah's hope for the UN Security Council to step in is wishful thinking. Israel has too much
influence over the US Congress, and will not permit it.
The Constitution for the Federation of Earth could provide the needed structure lacking in the present UN Charter.
It is time to ask the UN General Assembly to open its doors to the legally required Charter review, aiming for a new
world charter/constitution and a "new UN."
-- Dr. Roger Kotila, Editor, Earth Federation News & Views
 Jerusalem For All

By Sami Jamil Jadallah on January 27, 2017

Haaretz, the well-regarded Israeli newspaper when it comes to Israel or the Arab-Israeli conflict, is much more

credible than the New York Times or the Washington Post; and Haaretz recently published an opinion by Gideon

Biger, in which he disputed the premise and the claims that Jerusalem is the Capital of the Jews, with “research

showing the city has existed for about 4,000 years. During the first 1,000 years it had no connection to the Jewish


Perhaps Mr. Trump, in finalizing his decision to move the US embassy from Tel-Aviv to Jerusalem, should really think of a

“Jerusalem for all” as the US policy for the future, with the US embassy in Jerusalem serving all the people and

residents of Jerusalem, including the more than 70,000 Palestinians forced out of Jerusalem by the Israelis. It would be

even greater if the US embassy in Jerusalem were to be the American embassy representing America in a united One

State — a state for all of its people, Israelis and Palestinians.

Israel, as an occupying power, is unfit and unqualified to rule and manage the city. With the Palestinian leaderships

having abandoned Jerusalem and its Arab citizens in Oslo, it too is unfit and unqualified to represent and protect the

interests of Palestinians in Jerusalem.

A young Israeli boy and his Palestinian friend realize that their bond of friendship supersedes cultural or religious


Israel, contrary to its marketed slogan as “the only democracy in the Middle East”, is a racist xenophobic country, and

has never been a country for all of its citizens.

The PLO leadership is a self-serving, corrupt, inept organization that cannot be trusted to represent, let alone protect,

the life and rights of those whom it claims to represent.

For now, nothing short of providing international protection for the Palestinian population of Jerusalem and in the entire

Occupied Territories will do. The US is a party to the conflict, and cannot be trusted to be a fair and honest broker.

There is an urgent need to place the entire Occupied Territories under an interim international trusteeship, while both

sides the Israelis and Palestinians work out the details for the One State for All of its people.

The Palestinians under Israeli Occupation are “damned if they do and damned if they don’t.” While all nations and

people have an absolute and inalienable right to resist foreign occupation including armed resistance, Palestinians are

the only people and nation denied such rights. Any form of resistance is seen as “acts of terrorism”, and this label is

sanctioned by the PLO, Oslo and the United States.

All official Israeli armed acts, along with the acts of criminal trespassing settlers, are deemed “self-defense” no matter

what are the circumstances, including targeted assassinations, detentions without charges, house demolitions, acts of

arson, cold-blooded murders, uprooting, burning of hundreds of thousands of olive trees, confiscation of property and

denial of access to one’s land and farm.

Knesset’s Ayelet Shaked: “Palestinian children are “‘little snakes'”

The Palestinians are denied any right to self-defense, let alone any right to resistance against the Israeli Occupation.

Keep in mind the Palestinian Authority and leadership role is a commercial and security partner with the Israeli


For nearly 50 years, since the Six Day War, Palestinians in Jerusalem have been suffering from daily discrimination and

ethnic cleansing by Israelis, supported for the most part by wealthy Jewish Americans using tax exempt organizations

to confiscate Palestinian properties under the pretense of being “Jewish” properties.

Israeli courts, for the most part, allow falsified and fraudulent deeds in support of such criminal activities, as we have

seen most often in the Jerusalem neighborhoods of Sheik Jarrah and Bab-el-Amoud.

Since the founding of Israel, and prior to the 1967 War, Jerusalem was divided by barbed wires, with East

Jerusalem under Jordanian control and West Jerusalem under Israeli control. There was some minor UN presence.

It was only after the Six Day War that Jerusalem was united under total Israeli control, and formally annexed to Israel

shortly after the end the war.

Fence Building – This is the fence that Bibi built with American dollars

Israel moved quickly and swiftly to consolidate its control over East Jerusalem making dramatic changes in the city

demographics, by totally destroying entire Arab neighborhoods. This was the case with “Maghreb Quarter” near the

Dome of the Mosque.

Declaring the unified city as its eternal capital, Israel began to use a series of dubious laws as a legal means to

ethnically cleanse the city of its Arab residents.

First it denied Palestinians their right of residency under many pretenses, and then used “absentee laws” to officially

steal and confiscate their properties.

By now, and after 50 years of total control over Jerusalem, Israel proved over and over it is not a fair or honest trustee

of a city of both Jews and Arabs (Christians and Muslims); its policies are so discriminatory, it disqualifies Israel from

managing a unified city.

Israeli police on al Aqsa

On the other hand, and notwithstanding empty statements by the late Yasser Arafat and his successor Mahmoud Abba,

Jerusalem and its Arab residents were never a priority. They never received the necessary material support to help

Arabs fight Israel’s onslaught on their very existence in the city.

The Palestinian leadership never translated its words to action to help Arab residents in their struggle to stay. Little,

if any, legal support was given to the Palestinians to help them fight expulsion, or fight the confiscation or demolition of

their properties.

The cost of one international trip by Mahmoud Abbas and his entourage perhaps could have covered all the court costs

and fines. The Palestinian PLO leadership, just like Israel, is not qualified to represent and guard the interests of Arabs

in the city.

“Jerusalem for All” would keep the city unified under international agreement, and preserve the unique

quality of the city, and its special status as a holy city for Jews, Christians and Muslims.

It will be worthwhile to explore such an international conference, supported by a UN Security Council resolution.


October 15, 2016
! Why Not !
by Bob Neumann

King used the idea,
Gandhi's old idea.
Fight with non-violence.
Push for a clear, simple change,
very hard
without violence
with high purpose.
Discipline the peace warriors,
Train them in "Sit In" non-violence.
Singing and love are just
much more powerful than bullets,
just maybe -- some of the time.
The Civil Rights movement worked.
The color revolutions sorta worked.
Dozens of non-violent revolutions
like the Velvet Revolution
have worked well.
Solve problems civilly
with peace warriors -- trained,
with mass uprisings,
Instead of guns,
without guns.
Just a tad more civilized!
Voting with our precious time & tired feet,
sorta "direct," disciplined, democracy --
a head and heart vote
outside the ballot box.
Not as good or democratic as the ballot box,
but too often excruciatingly necessary.
Could this be the world's peaceful
path to world government ?

by Bob Neumann

September 15, 2016

Two Reasons for War

Hank Stone


War famously being “hell,” why do we Americans do so much of it? 


There are two big reasons we have wars. 


Money, of course, is the obvious reason.  Our country spends about $1 trillion every year on wars and preparations for wars.


Everyone who gets that money is understandably concerned that peace may break out. 


The man on the street does not want war, but doesn’t like to think about it either.  So he delegates thoughts about war and peace to leaders who promise to keep us safe.  Those leaders generally can gather more personal power, and get a pass for possible misbehavior, if the people are agitated about crazy terrorists under their bed.


So everyone who receives a piece of that $1 trillion per year, understandably enough, likes war.


The other big reason America gets into wars is a constellation of traditions. 


Everyone who was around after World War 2 was regaled by heroic tales of brave soldiers, who kept America safe by fighting “the good war.”  We have experienced parades, marching bands, snappy uniforms, medals, and clean-cut, disciplined, fearless young men.


At the same time, the U.S. economy has been strong for our whole lives.  The Korean War was unsatisfying, and the Vietnam War was problematic, but the institution of war never wrecked our economy.  War keeps us safe.  Freedom isn’t free.


Periods of war, punctuated by periods of peace, seem normal to us.  Our children watch GI Joe cartoons, and celebrate the death of the evil “other.”


When so instructed, we citizens seamlessly switch from fear of Germans and Asians, to fear of possible terrorists – anyone who looks Middle Eastern.


There is an important difference between those who receive money and power from the war system, and we who simply find getting into wars traditional, and normal.


The difference is like wolves and sheep having dinner together.  The wolves make the arrangements, and collect the money.  The sheep appreciate the tradition, but recognize too late that they are on the menu.


In our money-oriented culture, it’s hard to fault the weapons makers and military brass for doing what they do.  But the time has come for the rest of us, who are made poorer and less safe by militarism, to reconsider our support for the tradition of war.


For militarily weak countries, war may sometimes be unavoidable.  The U.S., by contrast, has extraordinary military power.  We always have alternatives to war.


We Americans don’t need to be aggressors.  We don’t need to be thieves.  We don’t need to be murderers.  We don’t need to be fearful.  And we don’t need to be sheep.


by Hank Stone

August 1, 2016

Is Anything Sacred Anymore?
Americans appear less than satisfied with their presidential candidates. Reactions for many Americans are a state of disbelief and a growing sense of despair and gloom. Rants from Trump, accusations of criminal conduct by Clinton, and lying by both candidates cause voters to ask themselves, "Is there anything sacred anymore?"  

Yes, reader, the sacred still exists, but to find it I recommend that you attend the Democratic World Federalist's Good Government Luncheon on August 6th, 2016 at the WildFox Restaurant in Novato, CA.  For more information go to

Speaker Stephan Dinan's new book "Sacred America Sacred World" takes consciousness to where national patriotism begins to include world patriotism. Do not be deceived by the phrase "sacred America."  Dinan is not glorifying America.  He knows its dark side, its shadow. "Sacred" for Dinan has a different meaning. 

He describes a (spiritual) shift from a focus on "me" to "we."  His respect for the "sacred" is not just theoretical or academic; it is more than meditation seeking inner peace; there is a call to r-evolution that takes us to the United Nations and beyond.
                                             GLOBAL REPORT  -  June, 2016

 Activities on behalf of the Earth Constitution and a decent future for humanity have been rapidly expanding over the first half of 2016.  I am very pleased to submit this report and overview of some of these activities.  It is impossible to include mention of all the WCPA activities that are happening worldwide, and I apologize to any of our activists who may feel they have been left out of this report. The report focuses primarily on new developments within the 2016 year with the understanding that many worthy WCPA projects cannot be included in any single report.

     Our work is absolutely vital for the future of a humanity faced with evermore lethal global crises, from climate collapse to planetary pollution to a new nuclear arms race every bit as dangerous as that of the Cold War.  Only a global social contract under the Earth Constitution can bring us together to the point where we can effectively address these crises before it is too late. Planetary democracy, universal world citizenship, and democratically legislated law enforceable over all individuals form the key elements in this social contract. The Earth Constitution gives us a peace system, a freedom system, a justice system, and a sustainability system.  Without such democratically founded planetary systems, it is difficult to see that humanity has any viable future at all.  In the light of this background, I believe this report from the first six months of 2016 is grounds for genuine hope.

1. The 14th session of the Provisional World Parliament in Kolkata, India, December 2015 (photo below). It met under the umbrella of the larger World Thinkers and Writers Peace Meet, sponsored by ISSAR and directed by WCPA Vice-President Dr. Santi Nath Chattopadhyay.  At the head table in the second photo, to my right, is Puan Sri Datin Seri N. Saraswathy Devi, of Malaysia, a Vice-President of WCPA, who honored the Parliament with her internationally recognized legal prominence by joining us at the high table.  To my left is Dr. Eugenia Almand, Secretary of the Provisional World Parliament. These photos were taken by our WCPA Technical Assistant Mr. Josiah Eck, who accompanied me to the parliament and on my subsequent speaking tour.

The Parliament considered and passed a number of acts, among them two truly historic legislative acts, one for merging the UN under the Earth Constitution and the second for a “Global Sustainability Directorate” integrating the many UN agencies working for sustainability together under the Earth Constitution.(This act draws upon the Parliament’s earlier act creating the “Earth Emergency Rescue Administration (EERA),” updating it and integrating it into the many actually existing UN agencies directed to sustainability.)

2.  Deriving from this accomplishment, one major WCPA project of the past six months has been to bind these legislative acts into a book along with the Earth Constitution and send this volume to all heads of UN agencies and world leaders.  These acts are very forward-thinking and might just strike a resonate chord in some world social and environmental leaders concerning the practical and concrete steps that might be taken for uniting the world under the Earth Constitution and saving our planet from self-destruction. We have had to struggle to find funding to support this costly project but are determined to carry it forward despite all obstacles.  We have the wonderful cooperation of Dr. Sid Smith, Director of the Institute for Economic Democracy Press, and of Swami S.A.R.P.V. Chaturvedi and the Sri Ramanuja Mission Trust in India.  SRMT has volunteered to arrange the major portion of this publication in India, for which we are very grateful.  The book, about to go to press, is called Our Common Future: The UN as an Effective Peace and Sustainability System.  World Parliament Breakthrough Legislation under the Earth Constitution. Here is a photo of the front and back covers as designed by Sid Smith.

3.  I want to formally introduce to you all our WCPA Administrative Assistant to the President, Ms. Becky Galdo. Becky has done a wonderful job over the past year in helping get the word out worldwide about the Earth Constitution as the only practical and viable option available to humankind at the present moment.  She has approached this work with intelligence, independence, creativity and dedication, for which we are very grateful.  Becky just graduated from Radford University (photo) and is now in the graduate program for Social Work at University of South Florida in Tampa.  Despite the fact that WCPA struggles with a lack of resources to support our work, it appears to me that Becky has been the best possible investment that we could have made.
4. Becky has been developing websites, Facebook pages, and electronic mailing lists for us, as well as posting on diverse other sites.  These include a separate site for the Collegium of World Judges (, a site for the World Constitution and Parliament Association (www., a site for the World Parliament:(, and a Facebook page for the Earth Constitution:

5.  Mr. Peter Graves-Goodman, WCPA Vice-President in Miami, Florida, is working on updating our main website ( so that people will be able to sign the Earth Constitution and join WCPA electronically. This feature will finally bring our electronic media into the 21st century where it belongs.

6.  My new book One World Renaissance: Holistic Planetary Transformation through a Global Social Contract has been published by IED Press as of 2016.  It involves a sustained philosophical elucidation of the concept of holism in relation to human values and the foundations for democratic world law.  I am hoping it will serve our work by laying the intellectual groundwork for the Earth Constitution.  Becky has created and maintained a website and blog for the book at:

7. We were honored to have as delegate to the Parliament, Sri E.P. Menon, a Vice-President of WCPA and long-time social activist and supporter of our work, whose home is in Bangalore, India. Following the Parliament, Menon organized for us an itinerary of speaking engagements in South India and Bangalore, from where I also sent copies of the Earth Constitution to Prime Minister Modi and President Mukherjee.  We were also honored to have Dr. Klaus Schlichtmann as a delegate.  Klaus, who lives in Japan, is internationally recognized as a scholar and historian of the peace movement and the World Federalist Movement worldwide.  He is Distinguished Advisor to WCPA along with Swami S.A.R.P.V. Chaturvedi.

8. Justice David Percy Quispe Salsavilca from Peru has contacted us about the Collegium of World Judges and also has submitted an article that we will be publishing.  We are looking forward to working with him in this project. As you know, the Constitution established a Collegium of World Judges from which all members of the eight benches of the World Supreme Court system will be drawn.  I believe this is also indicative of our growing presence in Latin America.  Traditionally WCPA had presence in a number of countries in Africa and Asia but less so in South America, in spite of our dynamic center in Costa Rica led by Lic. Celina Garcia.  Though her work and that of others this is beginning to change.

9. In Latin America, in the past year I have visited both Ecuador (from where I sent a letter to President Correa) and Venezuela on behalf of our work. In Venezuela, we had extensive contact with the World PROUT Movement through Dada Maheshvarananda who directs a Cooperative in Caracas and with others in the PROUT network within Venezuela, such as Professor Dorkis Shephard and Mr. Eugenio Mendoza.  The founder of PROUT, Indian Guru P.R. Sarkar, advocated world unity, world spirituality, and world government.  Hence, there was a very positive response to the Earth Constitution among PROUT supporters in Venezuela. 

     Venezuela is a socialist country that promotes cooperatives and socially conscious work for the common good of all: healthcare, education, food and housing.While there, I also met with government ministers: Mr. Tulio Virguez from the Ministry of Foreign Relations (right hand photo below with red hat), Riccardo from the Venezuelan Embassy in San Francisco (on my left), and Juan Pablo from the Ministry of Justice. They gave me a copy of the Venezuelan Constitution in English and saw the comparisons with the Earth Constitution, which I gave them in Spanish and English versions.We joined a big march in Caracas on behalf of the Bolivarian Revolutionary Government and its commitment to democratic solidarity with all persons. The photo to the left shows both this march in support of democratic socialism, and the center photo below shows our host, Eugenio Mendoza, his wife Cris, and their son Mario, along with two men to the right who gave us a tour of the military prison now a museum, that chronicles the oppression of freedom throughout Latin America. Both these gentlemen are former prisoners in this facility.

10. In December in Delhi, I had the good fortune of meeting Swami Agnivesh (photo below) who wanted to find out more about the Earth Constitution. Swami Agnivesh has long been a prominent member of leader in the Interreligious Dialogue movement and a leader in collaboration with the UN to end human trafficking and bonded labor. I used his new book called Applied Spirituality in my Philosophy of Religious Course at Radford University during the spring semester 2016. He understands the need for a human unity in diversity under the Earth Constitution. He writes:

“The seeds of globalization lie buried deep in spirituality, which is the only authentically universal vision that humankind has ever had. It is doubtful that any international organization would have come into being, but for the pattern that existed already in spirituality. Unlike the mechanisms of institutionalized religions, the call of true spirituality has always been to transcend the familiar boundaries drawn by individual and corporate ego, and to discover the unity underlying the diversity which marks our world” (p. 65).  This statement could very well apply to the Earth Constitution, which, as we all know, is predicated on unity in diversity that derives from an authentic spirituality that has no need to identify with any exclusive and limited religious institutions.  Swami Agnivesh will be meeting with Pope Francis this month and presenting him a copy of the Earth Constitution.

11.  In May and early June, Phyllis and I went to Thailand and Japan.  Dr. Phichai Tovivich, WCPA Vice-President, and Director of Universal Love and Brotherhood for Thailand, had organized the first international ULBA Thailand Conference (photo left below with Phyllis Turk, CNM, WCPA Treasurer).  There were participants there from a number of countries besides Thailand: Vietnam, Australia, Japan, Nepal, the US, etc. He arranged for accommodations for us in the Guest House of Chulalongkorn University, where the conference was also being held.  Dr. Phichai did a wonderful job putting together a truly impressive conference and special ceremonies (center photo below). I presented my paper called: “Holism, Universal Love, and Democratic World Law” (photo) through a corresponding Power Point presentation. There were many interesting speakers at this conference.  We distributed many copies of the Constitution and other WCPA literature to the group.

12. An extraordinary moment happened at the Thailand ULBA conference when Mr. Madan Bhadur Pradhan introduced himself to me (photo wearing white with Rev. Lama Monk J.B. Tamang).  Mr. Pradhan had been a Vice-President of WCPA during the 1980s and early 90s. He was also Assistant Minister of Agriculture and Education for the Nepal government, and had been appointed by the Provisional World Parliament as Environmental Minister for the Earth Federation.  He had participated in the World Parliaments in Delhi and Miami Beach, Florida in 1985 and 1987. Mr. Pradhan was anxious to resume his work on behalf of the Earth Constitution. He said he had come to Bangkok just to meet me there and introduce himself. WCPA has a number of contacts in Nepal but no Vice-President or major officer.  I was delighted to re-recognize his status in view of his long history of service to our cause.  With his international experience Mr. Pradhan can lead a resurgence of interest in the Earth Constitution both in Nepal and within the South Asian nations.

13.  On May 27th we flew to Japan. We had been graciously bid farewell by Dr. Phichai in Bangkok and then met at Osaka Airport in Japan by Mr. Katsuya Kimura who kindly lodged us in the Oomoto Guest House at Kameoka.  On Sunday, May 29th, Mr. Kimura drove us for two hours to Takasago, where the Oomoto Temple there had organized an elaborate and beautiful Poetry Festival. Forty selected poems about peace (from the many submitted by Oomoto members) had been put to music and sacred chant, resulting in a wonderful and inspiring sacred spectacle to those many people assembled under the awnings in the gentle rain. 

On May 30, an interview was arranged for me with the ULBA staff in which Mr. Hiromi Yano asked about our work on behalf of the Earth Constitution and served as translator. I also distributed copies of the Constitution and other literature in English to people in the ULBA division of Oomoto.We need translations of our literature into Japanese and other languages.The Earth Constitution is already in Japanese, but we need it distributed widely in Japan through cooperation with ULBA and Oomoto. We were very pleased to have the kind interest of Asada Tokihiko, Chief Director of the Oomoto Headquarters, Rev. Toshiomi Okuwaki, Director, Jinruiaizenkai Editorial Department, and Yasuhiko Inagaki, Vice-President of ULBA.

14.  While in Kameoka I had the pleasure to meet Mr. Chayne Ellis, originally from Australia, who has lived in Japan for 14 years. He directs a school there as well as doing regular work for Jinruiaizankai in Kameoka.  He is also a friend of Dr. Phichai Tovivich in Thailand.  Chayne is a person of great energy and intelligence who had already researched WCPA carefully before we met.  He already know our strengths and weaknesses and the difficulties we face in trying to make the Earth Constitution a household word throughout the planet. Chayne wants to work with us and I knew immediately that he would bring these good qualities to WCPA work in Japan.  I am proud to have him as the President of our WCPA Japan Chapter and member of our International Advisory Board.
By coincidence (or perhaps it was the synergistic global movement of convergence toward the Earth Constitution), I was also contacted by Mr. John Rachel after arriving home to Virginia. John lives in Japan and would like to work for the Earth Constitution.I put him in contact with Chayne Ellis.Japan is a place of great beauty, civility, and community.It is also a place where many understand the horror of nuclear weapons. I think the time is right for a renaissance for the Earth Constitution in Japan.

15.  From June 1 to 3, Phyllis and I were in Hiroshima, hosted by the World Federalists of Hiroshima, Professor Shaw Fujii, Professor Mineko Morishita, and Professor Tadaakira Jo (in that order on my right in the photo).  While at the Peace Center, we met with Secretary General Yasuyoshi Komizo and Director Yasco Suehiro in the offices of Mayors for Peace (left of Phyllis in the photo).  They told me that more than 7000 mayors of cities around the world were organized in this effort to end nuclear weapons, which is a truly wonderful movement in my view. They shared important and detailed literature on their work, its history and significance. I urged them to consider that the world needed to adopt a “world peace system” to replace its present war-system and that the Earth Constitution was the blueprint for that world peace system that would end not only nuclear weapons but all wars everywhere.  We gave out copies of the Earth Constitution and other literature to all of these leaders. We were especially hosted most wonderfully by Professor Mineko Morishita, who spent a day with us visiting the Peace Park and the beautiful island and World Heritage site of Miyajima.
16.  I was also recently contacted by Richard Maxheim from Germany, a long-time World Federalist who wishes to work on promoting the Earth Constitution in Germany.  I was very pleased at this development. More and more, Federalists around the world (sensing that their movement needs a clear and immediate framework that can save the Earth from immanent disaster) are turning to WCPA as a way of making a concrete contribution to a decent future for humanity.  We have the Earth Constitution in a paperbound German edition already, and I will be sending this to Mr. Maxheim along with other literature.  In the meantime, Dr. Eugenia Almand will be digitizing the German translation of the Constitution for Mr. Maxheim to put on the website he has already created for this purpose at:   There are many world federalists in Germany and in the European Union, which is important for our work because they already understand that the world needs a good constitution.  We will be approaching them not only from Germany but also from Belgium (see below) with the message that the Earth Constitution is our best and most practical option. I look forward to working with Mr. Maxheim and others in the German Republic.

17.  It is important to mention here that Mr. Amit Paul, president of the Delhi Chapter of WCPA, has been directing his dedication to a just and peaceful world under the Earth Constitution into passing law examinations in Delhi.  He has spent years helping ordinary, often victimized, people submit affidavits and requests in the court system of Delhi, but with passing further examinations he will be able not only to serve people more effectively but promote the Earth Constitution among the judiciary and legal community in the capital of India, which he has been doing for several years now. He writes: “I want to travel in different countries spreading this message among the masses in humble way to work tirelessly for ONENESS of HUMANKIND, and to work for WORLD CONSTITUTION for the FEDERATION Of EARTH, which I hope to start from this year.”  Amit Paul was instrumental in arranging many activities for me in Delhi during December of 2015 (just before the Parliament in Kolkata). He is truly a key person for promoting the Earth Constitution in India and beyond, and I very much appreciate his lifelong dedication to our work.

18. In the photo, Dr. Roger Kotila, Vice-President, WCPA (center), with Dr. Bob Hanson and Ms.Vivian Davidson, are in historic Brussels, Belgium, home to the European Parliament and many World Federalists. Roger writes: “A world federalist colleague, Shahr-Yar Sharei, studied law at the University of Kent. Based upon his doctoral research into international law (or lack thereof) and the UN Charter, he has concluded that the UN is legally required to conduct a Charter review.  As a consequence of his findings, he is in the process of setting up a new think tank – the Center for United Nations Constitutional Research (CUNCR), to be located here in Brussels.”  Roger was in Brussels to make contact with European Parliamentarians and World Federalists, and to see that any Charter review process for the UN will include the proposal to replace the Charter with the Earth Constitution.
As this report on some recent WCPA activities for the first half of 2016 illustrates, all around the world WCPA leaders are working to bring the Earth Constitution to the attention of the Citizens of the Earth. There is a synergistic movement taking place in which people are recognizing the key role of the Constitution for the future of humanity. It must be studied, modeled, promoted and disseminated in every possible venue.  It is surely the best hope for our seriously endangered world.  It serves both as a concrete blueprint on how we could really create a world peace, freedom, justice, and sustainability system and an ideal from which to critically evaluate our failed efforts in the present.  If we all keep up the good work, the time is not far off when the Constitution for the Federation of Earth will become a household word all over our planet.  And that will be the moment when the people of Earth realize that we really do have a way out from our present disastrous system.  We really can choose to transform the Earth into a decent, sustainable community for all its citizens. But this will not happen until people everywhere are aware of the Earth Constitution.  We believe that it is our duty, as people who have signed the “Pledge of Allegiance to the Constitution for the Federation of Earth,” to make


February 29, 2016
Palestinian Professor Concludes That Diversity a Key to Survival

"Conscious that Humanity is One despite the existence of diverse
nations, races, creeds, ideologies and cultures and that the
principle of unity in diversity is the basis for a new age when
war shall be outlawed and peace prevail;..."  
Editor's note
[Below is a recently received email from Professor
Mazin Qumsiyeh who provides human rights news and
commentary from the rarely reported viewpoint of the
Palestinians themselves. His insights regarding the
value of "diversity" are shared by the Earth Federation
as reflected in the excerpt shown above from the
Professor Qumsiyeh writes:
Mea culpa: I shared as part of my last email an anecdote what Hillary
Clinton said in a letter to Saban. In that letter Clinton asserted her
opposition to BDS but did not say she supports killing Gaza children. The
latter part apparently was a news item of a satirical nature.  I am sorry
for this error. Clinton and Trump and Sanders remain strong Zionist
supports and have not challenged Israel’s ongoing genocide of native

Now on ongoing matters, a cease fire was declared in Syria brokered by the
US and Russia which is a good thing. The twin rogue regimes of Israel and
Saudi Arabia are not happy. The former rattled its military wares and
killed a few more Palestinians. The Saudi regime cut off aid to the
Lebanese army while dumping more weapons on civilians in Yemen. Personally
I was reflecting on issues of Invasive Species. Here in Palestine we see
more and more invasive species: crows, mina birds, Zionist settlers and
European Pine and Australian "ornamental" trees they brought that are
taking over vast areas of the country and damaging native flora and fauna.
530 native villages diverse in customs and culture and religion were wiped
out to make space for the invasive species. Biodiversity shrunk in the face
of the onslaught.

Many human beings especially those who look at life from a narrow
perspective (sometimes called fundamentalists) view diversity as harmful
and want to create a more homogeneous society with their group/idea
dominating it. The Pharisees of 2000 years ago were a powerful sect mired
in ritualistic traditions which predated by some 300 years the evolution of
Rabbinical Judaism. Jesus challenged them for their orthodoxy of thought
that he considered disconnected from reality and needs of the people. In
the past 2000 years similar ideas opposing diversity were resurrected from
crusaders to Islamic fundamentalism, to white supremacy, to genocide of
Armenians by Ottoman turks, to Nazi atrocities of murdering millions, to US
genocides in Cambodia and Vietnam, to apartheid in South Africa, to Rwanda,
and most recently to Zionist genocide of native Palestinians.

Working and adapting to changing landscapes is based on diversity whether
in natural world (Darwinian evolution) or in human societies (cultural
evolution). This is a key to survival but the reverse is also true: most
isolationist ideologies that refused to accept concepts of diversity are
extinct or almost extinct. Zionism will thus also end. I am beginning to
wonder if the ultimate trajectory of Jewish colonization of Palestine is a
complicated ritual (sacrificing the native Palestinians) to arrive at a
culminated predictable mass suicide (ala Samson or Masada).  I say this
with some trepidation because all my life I have been working hard to
insist that there is a way out based on human rights and international law
that guarantees mutual survival and mutual respect for all people and ideas
in Palestine.  I still think it is possible (although that window is
closing very quickly thanks to Israeli actions) to return Palestine to a
multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multi-cultural society (albeit with now a
far more prominent Jewish and Hebrew presence).   Zionists insist on their
program that is analogous to the program of the crusaders to “Christianize”
Palestine and make it this fictional “Christendom.”  Zionists want to
transform the country to a Jewish state and their relentless program to do
that is now focused on Jerusalem and strengthening the Jewish only colonies
built around it on Palestinian lands.  When the Crusaders were defeated,
Christian presence here continued and actually flourished (my family is
descendants of Canaanites who converted to Christianity in the 3rd century
AD and lived through that tumultuous era as Arab Eastern Christians).

Intrinsically, people recognize that there is beauty and harmony in
diversity.  Every human being recognizes that spring is beautiful because
of the diversity of textures, flowers, animals, smells, faces, and foods.
From childhood we recognize that we do not like monotony and we like things
that mix colors or change routines.  That is also why jokes are funny as
they provide the unexpected punch line. I started to think that the same as
applies to considering the natural world of animals and plants beautiful
must also apply to diversity of people. Zionism and Nazism’s main failure
is that they wanted to create homogeneity.  Homogeneity is ugly by
definition even without considering the attempt to exclude what originally
made the place beautiful: the natives.

Stay human and help the natives

Mazin Qumsiyeh 
Professor and Director
Palestine Museum of Natural History
Palestine Institute of Biodiversity and Sustainability
Bethlehem University
Occupied Palestine

[Editor's note:  The above email
received 2/28/16.]

October 8, 2015

Pope and UN Sustainable Development Goals Inspire, but Fall Seriously Short

by Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

The talk to the United Nations by Pope Francis in late September along with the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030 by the UN General Assembly provide inspiration for a deeply troubled world beset with crises.  Yet what is missing is too important to ignore.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in recent Guardian newspaper articles asks if the UN is “still functional” and “fair?” Can it be fixed? What are the chances for reform?

World federalists have warned from the UN’s birth that the Charter is wrong.  Some of the world’s best thinkers, like Einstein and Freud, concluded that only a world government can do the job. 

The Charter is the UN’s Achilles heel.


The Charter must be “constitutionalized,” much like when the 13 American colonies abandoned the Articles of Confederation and replaced them by adopting a federal union model of government -- the US Constitution.

Transforming the UN is no longer out of the question. A new world Charter/Constitution has been successfully drafted by the World Constitution and Parliament Association.    

WCPA’s Constitution for the Federation of Earth, also known as the Earth Constitution, corrects the fatal flaws in the UN Charter.  It is the type of governmental structure that world federalists insist is what will be required if we are to “end the scourge of war.”  


In view of the availability of a replacement for the Charter, the Pope’s exhortations and the UN’s pronouncements fall seriously short. The Pope, perhaps unaware of a better alternative, lauds the UN Charter. UN member states, like dinosaurs, have remained stuck for 70 years in the same inadequate governing system.  

Rather than talk directly about the fateful problems with the Charter and the need for a new one, the Pope emphasized spiritual strategies: “The appeal to the moral conscience of man has never been as necessary as it is today.” He urges an “examination of conscience” for those “charged with the conduct of international affairs.”  

Meanwhile, proxy wars in the Middle East instigated by bully nations are causing terror beyond description. The US is busy invading nations and overthrowing governments. Now Russia weighs in bombing the very terrorists and mercenaries trained and armed by the CIA and its allies.  The UN tries to mediate peaceful solutions but mostly is reduced to the role of Red Cross, aiding desperate refugees fleeing the carnage.  


When changes to the UN are considered, they are invariably only cosmetic – appealing for “cooperation” and “partnerships,” expanding the size of the Security Council, or asking to have more say in selecting the next UN Secretary General.

Peace activists urge the Security Council’s Permanent-5 (US, Russia, China, Great Britain, France) to refrain from using the veto under certain dire conditions such as genocide.      

UN member states, the UN Association, other NGO’s, and the media rarely address the urgent need to replace the defective, aging Charter. The thought of a new Charter for a “new UN” seems to be out of the question, despite the fact that a new world Charter/Constitution is completed and ready to go

The very idea of such a game changer is seen as either utopian, or unrealistic.  There is a widely held belief, not without reason, that the Security Council’s P-5 would use their absolute veto power to block any new Charter -- no matter how good it is. 

The introduction of the Earth Constitution, along with the concept of “constitutionalizing” the Charter, could potentially overcome the stifling threat of the veto.  The absolute veto power granted the P-5 cannot be considered legitimate and may be challenged when democracy is the order of the day, and the Review required under the Charter has never been conducted.

To the Pope’s credit, he recognizes the key missing elements in UN governance --   democracy and enforceable law.  He states that all nations should have “a genuine and equitable influence on, decision-making processes.”  He adds that there is a need for the “rule of law” and “creation of a juridical system,” governing necessities lacking in the Charter.   


The UN is not democratic. The majority of nations and world citizenry have no say even though what happens globally affects everyone. Only the P-5 nations make final decisions. The remaining 188 nations have second class citizenship, only allowed to make “recommendations” for the P-5 to consider.

Loopholes in the Charter permit leaders of powerful nations and other VIP’s to be above the law. World crimes instigated by these leaders, by heads of multinational corporations, or by Big Money almost always go unpunished. The International Criminal Court and World Court (International Court of Justice) are small steps in the right direction, but are no match for these global shot-callers.

Despite glaring defects the Pope believes that the UN can yield “peaceful results” if only the Charter is “respected” and “applied with transparency and sincerity.” He is wrong.  

The Pope’s faith in gaining peace by respecting the Charter will fail just as “give peace a chance” and “all we need is love” failed.  Government has always been needed to maintain a civilized order, but we need the right kind of government.  


Recent doctoral research on the UN Charter and international law reveals that the UN is legally required to conduct a Charter Review but has failed to do so. Such a Review is part of a “constitutionalizing” process for the UN. The time is ripe for such an examination. 

The world feels like it is spinning out of control with the UN helpless to bring back order or stability. WCPA’s Earth Constitution is a carefully crafted document designed to defeat the geopolitical war system of which the UN and its Charter are an integral part. For the first time, there could be hope that a world of peace is possible.  

With the Earth Constitution a democratic world federation can be created with a democratically elected World Parliament and a rationally designed global judiciary system.  

Critical world problems -- wars, secret operations to overthrow governments, threats of nuclear destruction, climate change, deep pockets of poverty, and the violation of human and earth rights -- can be dealt with properly under the Earth Constitution.  

We must now hope that the UN General Assembly has the courage to begin a full Charter Review to analyze its fatal defects that will become increasingly obvious when compared to the Earth Constitution.

Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

Senior fellow, Institute On World Problem

Editor, Earth Federation News & Views


September 6, 2015

American Violence and the Commonwealth of God

by Professor Glen T. Martin


Much has been written recently about the pervasive violence, internal and external, of the living disaster that is the United States of America.   Articles have appeared about domestic violence, racist violence, prison violence, violence in the schools, police violence, violence against women, violence against immigrants, nation-building through genocidal violence, US imperial violence going back two centuries, the culture of violence, etc. Tom Engelhardt sums up much of this nicely in his June 2015 article “Armed Violence in the Homeland.”  In the article he reviews much of the violence that occurs nationwide on a daily basis and, under the subheading “Armed Dangers and Meal Tickets,” points out how little danger there is to our lives from ISIS or foreign terrorists compared to the daily police and civilian violence pervasive in America.  However, he points out that magnifying this so-called danger is the “meal-ticket” for the bloated national security state and the military-industrial complex.


In his other books and articles, however, Engelhardt also astutely documents the American drive to dominate the world through globally projected military violence, a huge militarism driven by the lust for empire, wealth, and the resources of our planet.  A recent complementary book by four scholars and peace leaders very much agrees. In The American Empire and the Commonwealth of God, David Ray Griffin, John B. Cobb, Jr., Richard A. Falk, and Catherine Keller collectively document America’s drive to dominate the Earth through militarism, deception, economic penetration, and guile.  The title of this article is influenced by their book, for I want to point out that the “commonwealth of God” that points beyond violence everywhere on Earth is not characterized adequately by any of these thinkers.  Engelhardt proposes no real solutions to the pervasive violence he documents and these four other thinkers, in my view, are merely lukewarm in their assessment of what is necessary if human life is to continue much longer on this planet.

Pentagon views of violence immature and childlike

There are likely many interconnected causes of violence on all these levels: economic, cultural, technological, systemic, etc., but all these causes keep most Americans in a state of immaturity not much beyond adolescence.  Violence is largely a symptom of immaturity: the people who work for the Pentagon are clearly childlike in their ignorant assumptions that violence can solve anything and everything.  The people in Homeland Security are similarly childlike in their belief that trashing democracy and freedom can somehow make us safer, and the people on Wall Street are like college students strutting their post-adolescent stuff: “mine is bigger than yours,” or “I’ve conquered or exploited more people than you have”—clearly this lust for power and extreme wealth is as childish as it is ignorant.  Garry Leach wrote a perceptive book called Capitalism: A Structural Genocide that underlines the point that there are also deep structural features to violence.  Immature people living in immature, undemocratic systems of greed, exploitation, and power will only produce more immature people in future generations. We need to overcome violence on all levels: personally, culturally, and structurally.


But there is a second form of structural violence ignored by many and barely touched on in The American Empire and the Commonwealth of God. This is the violence of the system of militarized sovereign nation-states, all claiming some absolute rights over this or that portion of the Earth and the right to militarize themselves against the violence of all the other sovereign nation-states.  Perhaps Mahatma Gandhi was right when he declared that the nation-state was “violence in a concentrated and organized form.”  Both the nation-state system and the system of global capitalism were born three to four centuries ago when human beings were as yet not capable of moving to a higher stage of maturity. 


Many psychologists and developmental thinkers are agreed on the basic stages of growth in moral maturity. I will summarize this in a generic way. (For more details see my recent books.) Human beings can progressively mature from the early magical and mythical stages of young children to the “ethnocentric” stage in which one identifies with one’s own nation, culture, and religion to stages of intellectual independence and “autonomy” and finally to stages of holism and “integration.”  The latter stages inevitably see the world as one and respect its unity in diversity. The fact of the matter is that science (for the past century) has discovered the holism of the universe, our planetary ecosystem, and human life with great clarity and vast amounts of evidence.  We are now in a position to do what they could not do when capitalism and sovereign nation-states were being developed—we can now see what holism means in our personal, social, economic, political, and cultural lives and adopt it for ourselves and our planet, overcoming the violence of immaturity and fragmentation and embracing our species and our planet with the unity in diversity that is now clearly understood as the fundamental reality of all things.


As Griffin, Cobb, Jr., Falk, and Keller point out, the holism of nonviolence, of unity in diversity, comes from a mature appropriation of the Jewish, Christian [and Islamic] traditions.  In this they are so refreshingly different from the legions of so-called Christian, Jewish [and Islamic] fundamentalists who cling to an idolatrous God of vengeance, violence, and destruction of their perceived enemies.  The Gospels of Jesus (as opposed to the lurid and revengeful Book of Revelation) clearly teach unity in diversity, nonviolence, universal love, and compassion.  However, these qualities must also be structurally translated into our fragmented and violent institutions of global capitalism and sovereign nation-states.


The clearest way to embrace the structural holism that will advance human maturity geometrically is to ratify the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.  This Constitution (written by hundreds of world citizens between 1968 and 1991 and widely available on the web) is predicated on the holism of unity in diversity for the entire Earth: politically, economically, and ecologically.  Only this kind of real conversion from the immaturity of fragmentation, hate, and fear, to the planetary maturity of universal democracy, mutual respect, and planetary cooperation can we turn our disastrous planet around in time to avoid universal death. 

Finding the real "commonwealth of God"


We are all one species, genetically almost identical with one another.  We all have the same needs, fears, hopes, and dreams.  We all want our children and future generations to avoid climate collapse or nuclear holocaust.  There is one way to go that is clearly superior to vain attempts to reform the UN, empty diplomacy, police body-cameras, or more spying and denials of freedom. We need to replace the UN Charter with the Earth Constitution. We need to really embrace the holism that is the foundation of the universe. This would be the real “commonwealth of God,” since all humans share the Earth in common, human nature in common, and hopes and dreams in common.  A true “commonwealth of God” would mean seeing the entire Earth as one economic and political community. Only the Earth Constitution makes this a structural reality and lays the groundwork for making it a cultural and spiritual reality as well.


Even though violence and fragmentation are worldwide and not simply “American,” in my many international travels I have found that there is much less violence among people elsewhere, who lack the amazing arrogance and egotism of the American psyche.  We can overcome this violence and fragmentation by identifying ourselves as truly “world citizens,” truly children of universal law under the Earth Constitution, and free of the identification with the fragmented and distorted laws of so-called sovereign nations.  Let’s do it. The move to planetary maturity comes from a decision at the deepest level of our lives, one that is possible for us all to make. Let’s truly embrace the holism of our situation and assume the dignity of real world citizens operating under the unity in diversity of the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.

by Dr. Glen T. Martin


August 20, 2015

BEWARE: Madeleine Albright’s Commission on Global Security, Justice, & Governance

An Open Letter from Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

[First published 8/6/15 in DWF News at]  [To be published in slightly edited form in The 2015 Perpetual Peace Initiative Monthly Message for August, 2015 edited by Rev. Rudolph Gelsey at]

 Good morning friends,

I just finished reading the report of the Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance. The report is advertised as “Confronting the Crisis of Global Governance.” I am not impressed.

The Commission co-chairs are former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, and a former Foreign Minister of Nigeria and past UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs, Ibrahim Gambari.

Madeline Albright has been described by investigative journalist and author William Blum as “ethically challenged.”

Albright is best remembered by her critics for a “60 Minutes” television interview with Lesley Stahl in May 12, 1996. Stahl asked about US sanctions against Iraq: “We have heard that a half million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died in Hiroshima. And you know, is the price worth it?”

Madeleine Albright: “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price—we think the price is worth it.”

Granted it is unfair to evaluate a report by attacking the integrity of one of its sponsors, but the Iraq nightmare caused by US sanctions (and invasion) leaves me questioning Albright’s value system and judgment.

Unless I read the report wrong, I’m guessing it is another (well-meaning?) ploy to postpone having authentic global democracy for all nations and for “we, the people” – an often used strategy to keep civil society (you and me) feeling like we are making “progress,” when in fact nothing of real significance is being offered.

The euphemisms in this report would make a snake oil salesman puff up with pride.   

The report, like the UN Charter, uses the right language (“justice”, “security”, and yes, of course, “PEACE”).  These are feel good words–but alas, missing is a plan for a strong enough geopolitical structure to be able to deliver (except in ways that don’t alter the good life for the 1%). 

There are no world federalist solutions here, except at the weak margins.  

Rather than recommend eliminating the permanent veto in the Security Council which would be a step toward democracy, the report only recommends that the P-5 nations consider “use of restraint in the use of the veto.” This is laughable, an insult to any thoughtful world federalist.

I’m having trouble finding the word “democracy” anywhere, only the empty phrase “global governance.”

From the Commission recommendations we can conclude that militarization will remain, but with some frosting on the cake so it tastes better. How will they end wars? By establishing a “UN Peacebuilding Council.” Leaders of powerful bully nations who commit world crimes will remain above the law, with no seriously effective enforcement system under consideration.

There is no adequate plan to end war and proxy wars; no plan that would eliminate nuclear weapons.  Resources will continue to be siphoned off to the military/industrial complex and to covert operations; hence, it will be hard to reduce poverty in the world despite the report’s call for “global economic cooperation.”

No proposed structure to give “we, the people” democratic control over multinational corporations and international Big Money.  The Wall Street Journal investor class (the 1%) and private equity firms will continue business as usual.  Your country could be up for sale next!

Climate change solutions will remain voluntary with no provision for enforceable universal legislative authority by the world community.   

No proposal to fundamentally change the UN Charter–the heart and soul of “modern” (medieval) geopolitics.  Bully nations and Big Money stay firmly in control, and global democracy is nowhere in sight.

There may be an opening for real change from all of this, but I’m not sure where a point of entry might be.  Perhaps through the proposed UN Parliamentary Network especially if that “network” demands Charter Review, and join forces with the Earth Federation Movement’s Provisional World Parliament under the Earth Constitution.

At least then we would know we are headed toward establishing a democratic world federal union government – what we all know is what is realistically needed.  

Your feedback?  (Am I being too harsh?)

By Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

Editor, Earth Federation News & Views

June 15, 2015

[Editor's note:  Dr. Martin points out that a list of citizen's responsibilities are listed separately from the Earth Constitution itself, and points out the difference between legal and ethical concepts.]  

The Concept of “Ethical Responsibilities” in Relation to the Earth Constitution


Glen T. Martin



here are those who say that the Earth Constitution is lacking a list of responsibilities. They claim that what the world needs is a constitution that makes very clear the responsibilities of the citizens of Earth.  They claim that the world needs a document, a constitution, that lists not only the rights of citizens but their responsibilities as well.  For this purpose, they proclaim, the Earth Constitution is not adequate.


This sort of flawed thinking both fails to understand the concept of democracy and, furthermore, confuses responsibilities in the ethical sense from responsibilities in the related (but not identical) legal sense.   A list of ethical responsibilities would have no place in a genuine Earth Constitution since a constitution is a legal document specifying the mechanisms by which decisions are made and who gets to make them (through elections, appointments, etc.).  Obviously anyone elected to any office within the Earth Federation Government has a responsibility to perform that office to the best of their ability, with honesty, integrity, and transparency. The Constitution makes this very clear.  Responsibility in this sense is intrinsic to the entire Constitution.  This means that the entire document is a document outlining the responsibilities of those who govern.


            Indeed, the very concept of democracy, from which the Earth Constitution springs, is a social and ethical conception that already includes both rights and duties.  As American philosopher John Dewey puts this: “Democracy signifies, on the one side, that every individual is to share in the duties and rights belonging to the control of social affairs, and, on the other side, that social arrangements are to eliminate those external arrangements of status, birth, wealth, sex, etc., which restrict the opportunity of each individual for full development of himself” (1963: 497).  Rights and duties are built into the very concept of democracy and do not need to be listed separately except for educational purposes that unpack for learners the depth of the meaning of the concept of democracy. It is the function of proper education to perform this task.


What of those citizens not under the responsibilities outlined for the governors?  A list of exhortations about what people who are not in governmental roles should be doing would destroy the excellent character of the Earth Constitution and turn it into another practically useless set of ideals like the Earth Charter or the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Both these documents give us only ideals and exhortations, not mechanisms for governing the Earth. 


How then to we get a list of responsibilities for citizens?  The obvious answer that these critics overlook is that citizen responsibilities can and should be legislated as duties under world law.  A constitution cannot have a list of these because it is up to the World Parliament to establish laws that articulate the responsibilities of citizens.  Are citizens responsible to vote?  To participate in politics?  To participate at the local, regional, and global levels?  To interact with the agencies of government?  To learn about the nature of world democracy and their role in the self-government of humanity?  A list of moral exhortations for these things should not be part of any constitution worth its salt, but the World Parliament can endeavor to answer these questions through creating good laws (in some countries, for example, voting is a legal requirement for citizens).


The philosophical basis for this distinction comes from philosopher of law Lon Fuller. In his well-known book The Morality of Law, Fuller distinguishes the “morality of duty” from the “morality of aspiration.”   The role of lawmakers is to articulate wisely, clearly, publicly, and responsibly, the morality of duty: that is, the basic minimum requirements that each citizen must follow in order to create the “reasoned harmony” that is the function of law among the citizens. 


These responsibilities of citizens and lawmakers do not exhaust the whole of morality, for Fuller, for there is also the “morality of aspiration” in which citizens identify the good or goods for their lives and pursue these goods.  Part of this morality of aspiration may be making exceptional contributions to the common good through practicing exceptional citizenship and making extraordinary contributions to society.  But lawmakers cannot legislate for this and it would be a mistake to attempt to do so.  This is the role of education and reasoned dialogue, not the job of a Constitution, nor of lawmakers.


The Earth Constitution provides a constitutional framework for the morality of duty on a planetary scale.  It presupposes both the duties of lawmakers and the responsibility of citizens to actively participate in their world democracy.  It provides for a law-making capacity in which the duties of citizens may be further detailed and elaborated.  The Constitution is entirely complete in this respect.


Hence, the Earth Constitution is not only properly formed as it is, it is the ultimate vehicle for activating responsibilities among the citizens of the Earth Federation.  There is no other way to legitimately do this.  If moral exhortation is what is wanted, then the world parliament can create an agency whose purpose it is to encourage the citizens of Earth to take responsibility for governing and participating in government. Some of this has in fact already been done by the Provisional World Parliament, including World Legislative Act number 26 (the Education Act) in which school children worldwide will be educated to take responsibility within the Earth Federation government.


Under this law passed for educational institutions worldwide insofar as they receive support from the Earth Federation government, students will study not only the Earth Constitution itself, but the nature of democracy, the responsibilities of world citizenship, and the fundamental world problems that the Constitution aims to address. Hence, the Earth Federation Government will emphasize responsibility at every appropriate occasion. Nevertheless, to repeat: moral exhortation has no place in the Constitution itself. 


Responsibilities can and should only be legislated by law if the document is to be a legally binding document.  And the mechanisms for legislating responsibilities are very clear in the Earth Constitution. Education of the citizens of the Earth for taking responsibility in the sense of the morality of aspiration will come from the educational function of the World Ombudsmus and other government agencies as well as from educational institutions worldwide under World Legislative Act number 26.


Indeed, the World Constitution and Parliament Association (WCPA) has not waited for the future implementation of the World Education Act. At its events worldwide, the WCPA passes out a card that details “Ten Principles of a Global Ethics.”  The list, that we continue to disseminate widely, and that can be found on my web site, illustrates the futility of trying to formulate a list of specific duties that might be somehow embodied in a legal document like the Earth Constitution.  These are the principles of a global ethics as promoted by the WCPA: 


1.     Dialogue. A World Citizen develops the capacity for dialogue directed toward mutual understanding. A World Citizen has the ability to listen carefully to others, to thoughtfully understand their point of view, and to respectfully dialogue in a process of increasing mutual understanding and learning.


2.     Nonviolence. A World Citizen affirms the principle of solving conflicts nonviolently.  As Mahatma Gandhi stated, there are dozens of ways to solve conflicts creatively and intelligently, respecting everyone involved.  World Citizens promote creative, nonviolent problem-solving.


3.     Human Rights. World Citizens affirm universal human rights and dignity. All people have dignity because all people participate in the miracle that is human life.  We human beings are self-aware beings capable of freedom, creativity, compassion, and justice. We have dignity that must not be violated. World Citizens stand by the rights enumerated by UN Universal Declaration and the Earth Constitution, Articles 12 and 13.


4.     Democratic Laws. World Citizens affirm the rule of just, democratic laws based on protection of civil liberties and human rights.  They support equality, freedom, and equal due process for everyone before the law.


5.     Compassion and Kindness. World Citizens understand that reason and dialogue must be complemented by compassion and kindness.  World Citizens are sensitive to the suffering of other people and animals. They act toward others out of kindness and compassion. In Buddhism this is called karuna. In Christianity, it is often called agape.


6.     Unity in Diversity. World Citizens understand that the world is a wonderful manifestation of unity in diversity that must be respected and encouraged. We are all one as human beings and as children of the divine, and we are all different from one another in races, cultures, beliefs, nations, and religions. World Citizens affirm this principle of unity in diversity for the entire Earth.


7.     Justice-making. World Citizens insist on promoting equal treatment and due process of justice for all persons before the law. If laws are unjust, World Citizens work to change them to protect everyone equally. Where people are being marginalized, hurt, or discriminated against, World Citizens side with the victims.


8.     Sustainability. World Citizens are committed to transforming the process of living on the Earth to sustainable, ecologically friendly forms of economics, production, consumption, and patterns of living.  World Citizens are committed to making the Earth a decent place for future generations through protecting and restoring our planetary environment.


9.     Global Education. World Citizens are committed to promoting global education with respect to all these ten principles. People everywhere should be developing global consciousness and a sense of global responsibility.


10.  The Earth Constitution. World Citizens understand that none of these 10 principles can be successful for the Earth without the rule of democratically legislated, enforceable law for everyone under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth:


The first thing that will strike the reader of these principles is that they are all open-ended because they are all aspects of the morality of aspiration and would be inappropriate for a morality of duty as required by law-makers and governments. You cannot require people by law to engage in dialogue directed toward mutual understanding, for example, you can only require them to negotiate, engage in diplomacy, or mediate. Dialogue directed toward mutual understanding, however, requires an ethical good will and discernment on the part of the participants that cannot be evaluated by the law. The law can only dictate external behaviors, including external manifestations of responsibility. It cannot dictate the ethical dimension of good will, discernment, love, or compassion that are essential to ethics and genuine responsibility.

Hence, the realm of moral responsibility requires a framework conductive to ethical growth and inner transformation toward a good will to do what is right.  That is why in the recent Building the New World Conference at Radford University, the WCPA initiated collaboration with the inter-spirituality movement and the ethical growth movement so widespread today among concerned citizens and leaders like Barbara Marx Hubbard, the Shift Network, and other visionary movements (see .  Government can help create this framework, indeed, with good educational policies both for children and for all citizens. But to try to place any such stipulations within a constitution would be inappropriate and irresponsible. 

This is true of all the principles listed here as components of a global ethics. Yet they are all valid principles that demand our attempt to participate in, and fulfill, these principles.  They demand our inner transformation toward ethical awakening and responsibility, which cannot be legislated nor demanded by government.  Both WCPA in the present and the Earth Federation Educational System in the future can and will promote these values, but the attempt to make them into law would be both totalitarian, futile, and self-defeating.


Those who claim that the Earth Constitution or the WCPA need to be more articulate about “responsibilities,” rather than just rights, do not know what they are talking about. The critics need to stop pontificating about “responsibility” and begin taking responsibility for the future by working on behalf of the Earth Constitution. At this point in history, there is no clearer responsibility, as the last of these ten principles also clearly asserts. 


The threat to the future is so immanent and so great (including climate collapse and the threat of nuclear war) that affirmation of the Earth Constitution becomes more of a moral imperative with each passing day.  World federalists of all sorts betray the future of the Earth and coming generations with their refusal to endorse the Earth Constitution and take responsibility here and now to start governing ourselves under that Constitution.  Here lies the essence of responsibility: not talking endlessly about it, but taking it upon ourselves in concrete action for democratic world government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.

--Article by Dr. Glen T. Martin

*********                         *********                              **********


Public Banking Institute News: June 8, 2015

Earth Federation News & Views Editor's note:
Below are excerpts from PBI NEWS.  These items were sent to the editor of Earth Federation News & Views by the Public Banking Institute.  PBI economic philosophy and  policy are generally consistent with that of the Earth Federation/Earth Constitution.  Indeed,  publicly owned, controlled, and regulated  banking is a necessity for a prosperous world economy that works for all, not just the 1%.  The mayor of Barcelona gets it.

In addition, the TransPacific Partnership scheme President Obama is attempting to fast track through Congress would grant multinational corporations power to overturn economic and environmental policies of governments if they interfered with profits.  Such a transfer of authority to the private sector would be prohibited under the Earth Constitution.  The TPP is for private interests whereas the Earth Constitution protects and enhances the world public interest.   -- EDITOR, Earth Federation News & Views]


BankerWins.jpg of Barcelona Calls for Public Banking

"You cannot leave something as important as economic policy and money which has a social function, in the hands of speculation and private interest," says Mayor Ada Coloau, the latest leader to adovate for public banks. "Here, there’s been a democratic deficit and lack of global collective and democratic control over money and the economic system in general." Read and watch the interview here.

Think the TPP is Bad? Wait 'Til You See the TTIP!

According to Dave Dayen, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, which President Obama is secretly trying to fast-track, could dismantle state-owned enterprises and public services--which would pose a direct threat to public banking efforts--and threatens "social, cultural, and even public health goals." Read more here.

Above two articles thanks to Public Banking Institute News. To learn more about the work of PBI go to                                                       

     **********                                             **********                                           **********

Editor's note:
  Duncan Graham's "Time for a UN Spring" challenges the power and legitimacy of the undemocratic UN Security Council.  The Security Council is an obstacle to a World Parliament.  The changes in the UN that Mr. Graham seeks could lead to UN Charter Review and the potential adoption of the Earth Constitution-- RK

April 6, 2015
Time for a UN Spring

Duncan Graham 
(From the December 2014 edition of Mondial -- published in Canada by the World Federalists.)

“The absolute refusal of the P5 to brook even small reforms seems absurd . . . . I do not know
when the Council equivalent of an Arab Spring will emerge to sweep away the legitimacy of
the P5 in the global system.” 

 -- Kishore Mahbubani, former Ambassador of Singapore to the United Nations, in his 2013   book, “The Great Convergence:  Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World.”

We are at an unprecedented period in our human history with planetary personal
communications, a global integrated economy and the evolutionary acceptance in the genome
that we are all one species, though a rich mosaic of cultures and ethnicities, the brotherhood
and sisterhood of humankind, the Nation of Humanity. Our cosmic identity is underlined
with space exploration and now the incredible landing on a comet.

But we are still in Neanderthal mode in our tribal relations, where the buzzwords
“international peace and security” of the UN Security Council are a hollow promise for the
hundreds of millions of people who go to bed hungry every night. Deaths by violence,
malnutrition and easily preventable diseases are an Auschwitz every ten months. And yet
world military expenditures (according to SIPRI, the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute) for 2013 were $1,747 billion and have been over a trillion dollars for ten years. The
permanent five members of the UN Security Council, China, France, Russia, UK, USA (i.e.
those same parties tasked with “maintaining peace and security”) are responsible for 71% of
world arms sales.

How much is $1,747 billion? Ten $100 bills are a thin 1 mm slice. A one-metre slab is a
million dollars. A billion dollars is one Km of $100 bills. World military expenditures is
1,747 Kms of packed $100 bills … and yet Malala has to plead for money to educate little
girls and boys.

Rescind powers of UN Security Council
A creative spark? At the World Federalist Movement - Canada’s AGM in Ottawa 25th Oct
2014 a resolution was submitted from the Vancouver Branch. It was introduced in a
teleconference call by Vancouver President Vivian Davidson. The resolution proposed that
World Federalists encourage members of the UN General Assembly to consider rescinding
Art. 24 of the UN Charter and that the Assembly itself assume responsibilities for
international peace and security, as allowed in Art 18 of the Charter, as a first step in creating
a political fluidity in the UN structure for the evolution of a democratic World Parliament and
Government. It is now history. The resolution passed.

Under Art. 24 of the UN Charter the members (UN General Assembly) confer on the UN
Security Council primary responsibility for international peace and security. The resolution
would have the Assembly rescind these powers.

This would leave responsibility for peace and security in the hands of the General Assembly.
According to Art. 18 of the UN Charter, decisions of the General Assembly on important
questions shall be made by a two-thirds majority of the members present and voting. These
questions shall include recommendations with respect to the maintenance of international
peace and security. 

188 UN member nations should not continue to be subservient
It has become a Vancouver project to propose to the remaining 188 members of the UNGA
that they need not, should not continue to be subservient to the entrenched interests of the
Permanent Five.

The mindless carnage of World War One gave political energy to create the League of
Nations,(“First Parliament of Mankind,” headlined the Globe, now the Globe and Mail), the
International Court of Justice and in 1929 The Pact of Paris or Kellogg-Briand Pact that
outlawed war. (“War Outlawed,” headlined The Globe).

World War Two led to the creation of the United Nations with 51 nations in 1945. The major
Allies, China, France, Soviet Union, UK, USA who had spent so much blood and treasure
against the Axis regimes, were the pioneers, the deliverers of an organization to “save
succeeding generations from the scourge of war.” Russia inherited the permanent seat that
had been assigned to the USSR in 1991.

In 1945 a world led by these quintuplets seemed to many the natural order of things. The
United States, with no domestic destruction and lower than the others in per capita deaths,
was the new superpower. France and U.K., though devastated by the conflict, still held
political dominion over great swathes of the globe with imperial dominance in Africa and
South Asia.

Insidious control of the UN a source of growing frustration
To give initial stability to these founding 51 nations of the United Nations a Security Council
was incorporated in the UN Charter with these five nations having permanent seats and their
concurring votes required for resolutions to pass – the so-called veto. Insidiously, the
Permanent Five’s assent is also required for any changes in the Charter itself. Art 108 on
Charter amendments requires 2/3rds members including all the permanent members of the
Security Council. After 1955 (Art 109) a conference to review the Charter could be held if so
decided by a majority of the General Assembly, but any amendments proposed would also
require the concurrent support of the P5.

With these provisions, there have been no significant changes to the Security Council except
in 1966, when the number of non-permanent members was increased from six to 10. These
two-year transients with a chance to posture on the world stage are elected to the UNSC by
the General Assembly for their contribution to international peace and security. 2014- 2015
members are Chad, Chile, Jordan, Lithuania, and Nigeria. 2015 –2016 members are Angola,
Malaysia, New Zealand, Spain, and Venezuela.

UN Security Council's veto power unacceptable

To have the same five permanent members with veto in 2014, with now 193 UN members, is
a stagnating anomaly, an anachronism that requires nothing less than the interring of the UN
Security Council. The Vancouver, now a WFM-C, resolution could be pulling the plug on a
log jam that is imminent in any case. In the July issue of Mondial our Exec. Director Fergus
Watt notes “the growing frustration among members of the General Assembly with the
secrecy and failures of the Security Council.” He was referring in this case to “electing” a
new Secretary-General by the General Assembly, which in effect rubber-stamps a closed-door
decision of the P5.

The UN General Assembly has been marginalized, and an osmosis of power and authority
(by rescinding Art 24) could provide an energizing political fluidity.

Were this to be adopted, it should also be accepted in some fashion that a decision of the
UNGA should represent 2/3rds majority of the world’s people, the brotherhood and
sisterhood of humankind, as well as (per UN Chapter, Art 18) 2/3rds of member states.

The World Federalists can provide the goal, the vision; but the how-to, the means that would
allow the UN to better fulfill its purposes in the event these measures are to be implemented,
is the work of a broadly based UN preparatory committee process.

Vivian Davidson’s poster says it best: “Don’t Stay Calm. Change the World.”

March 5, 2015

Justice Denied, Above the Law: Netanyahu, and Other Heads of State

by Roger Kotila, Ph.D.  (Article also at RSN -

The world’s current governing system allows heads of state and their accomplices to commit world crimes yet never be held accountable.  With but few exceptions, such individuals will never face a judge or jury.  

They are above the law.

In our geopolitical system, impunity is all but guaranteed despite violations of international law ranging from state sponsored terrorism to crimes against humanity and war crimes. 

Will the paranoid geopolitical dynamics voiced by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, coupled with a weak global governing system, lead to a nuclear holocaust with Iran its primary victim, and the rest of the Middle East collateral damage?

Should we take seriously Netanyahu’s past threats to attack Iran militarily, particularly if Israel rejects the agreement the United States is now brokering regarding Iran’s nuclear program?

Netanyahu’s March 3, 2015 speech to Congress leaves one with the impression that the U.S. Congress would support, without limit, almost any measure that Israel takes against Iran.  

We can safely assume that Netanyahu is not at all concerned that a military attack against Iran might make him a war criminal, nor does he seem aware that Israel’s secret intelligence agency, Mossad, has become a suspect in the 9/11 attack (never mentioned in Establishment media).

The 9/11 aftermath has been war, anarchy, and chaos which could conceivably serve to weaken Israel’s alleged enemies in the Middle East.

World’s judiciary system no match for crimes by heads of state

Netanyahu’s impunity is seen for others. War crime charges have never been brought against former president George W. Bush, Jr. for the invasion of Iraq with its untold death and destruction--all under false pretense. Similarly, President Obama will never face criminal charges over the deaths of innocents in his drone warfare operations.    

We see these glaring gaps in international law and order time and time again:  Charges of genocide and apartheid (Israel against the Palestinians); crimes against humanity (Israel against Gaza); war crimes (the U.S. invasion of Iraq); torture (CIA); violating human rights (e.g., Saudi Arabia); and the 9/11 cover-up—all remain in limbo with no legal action for true justice in sight.

Lawlessness in the global governing structure is a prime reason why peace and justice persistently eludes the world, and why the Earth Constitution was drafted by the World Constitution & Parliament Association. 

Quite simply, the United Nations and the international judicial system lack the tools needed to establish and maintain world law and order, and the Earth Constitution offers a way to overcome this disastrous and fundamental problem.  

Precursor to mass murder? 

In our lawless world, the danger that mass murder and annihilation will be unleashed must be assessed. Sociologist Abram de Swaan has identified “precursors” that are seen before mass killings take place. In “The Killing Compartments” (2015) de Swaan provides warning signs leading up to the possibility of mass annihilation.

With Netanyahu, some of these precursors can be found in the way he talks about Iran. 

Netanyahu makes Iran a “target group” for the Israeli regime, as was quite clear in his speech to the U.S. Congress. He demonizes Iran by claiming that Iran, not Israel, is the dangerous (potential) aggressor. He insists that Iran must be stopped before it is too late.

Netanyahu’s rhetoric fits in with what de Swaan identifies as precursors to a future outbreak of mass killing: a regime’s propaganda…”demonizes the target group.” 

“The target group (Iran) is depicted as the (potential) aggressor: the regime’s people (in this case, Israel) are the ones being threatened, and they (Israel) risk becoming the victim of the target group and its foreign patrons (the U.S.? Russia?).” 

Another precursor, explains de Swaan, exaggerates the importance of a current situation: “According to the regime, the present moment is a decisive turning point in history. From now on everything will be different, if only the regime’s people seize their chance to act together resolutely.”    

Unfortunately, acting “resolutely” for Netanyahu could mean launching a surprise “shock and awe” nuclear attack with the aim of bringing Iran to its knees before it can fight back.

Last but not least, de Swaan’s research reveals that those involved in massacres ordinarily have “full confidence of impunity.”  They do not believe they will ever face punishment.

Unlimited sovereignty opens the door to world crimes

The culprit that opens the door to world crimes without fear of punishment is unlimited national sovereignty. “Sovereignty” means no authority greater than itself.   Each nation is allowed to deal with its own internal affairs without outside interference. Few nations are willing to prosecute their own leaders for world crimes.

A dilemma for the citizenry occurs when a country’s ruling government becomes corrupt, or turns rogue. Elections are rigged. Legislators are bought and paid for.  Courts favor those in power. The media becomes merely a propaganda outlet.

If you are a citizen of such a country, those in power are able to block meaningful remedies from within. Hence the need for a higher level of judicial appeal beyond the national government.

Deeply flawed and weak UN judiciary system

At its core what is wrong is a deeply flawed UN Charter with an almost invisible judicial system. The UN Security Council allows its permanent five veto members special privileges.  They can prevent any prosecution of their own leaders, even if they have committed horrendous world crimes.

The International Court of Justice (also known as the World Court), the relatively new International Criminal Court, and the various ad hoc courts are not given enough authority to be able to provide justice when powerful heads of state are the criminals. Sovereignty is used to protect them from prosecution.

In the present geopolitical system then, most heads of state need not fear prosecution, especially those from powerful nations. Occasionally the ICC takes a case when the head of state is from a weaker nation like from Africa. Some heads of state have been tried using ad hoc courts such as created for the Nuremberg trials.

Higher level of justice through the Earth Constitution

The design of the Earth Constitution’s judiciary and enforcement system has provisions not found in the UN Charter that give a nation’s citizenry another level of legal action to deter world crimes, and provide a better opportunity for real justice when crimes occur.


Under the world judiciary of the Earth Constitution, heads of state like Mr. Netanyahu would have to think twice before committing world crimes. 

No one should be above the law.  

By Roger Kotila, Ph.D.                                                                                                                            Editor, Earth Federation News & Views  in

February 13, 2015

Progressive View column by Dr. Bob Hanson in the Rossmoor News (California), February 4, 2015 





You may have heard of the “Doomsday Clock.”  The clock represents the count down down to zero in minutes to nuclear apocalypse…midnight.  The project is carried on by the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.  This is the 22ndtime since 1947 that the hands of the clock have been moved.  This year, these nuclear experts moved the minute hand ahead two minutes…not a good sign.  The clock has ranged from a low of two minutes to a high of 17 minutes at the end of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.  I’m sure there are a number of factors taken into consideration when these knowledgeable scientists move the minute hand backward or forward, but a major one has to be the refusal of the United States and the other nuclear weapons states to live up to our obligations to begin dismantling our warheads and leading the way toward a world free of nuclear weapons.  We had agreed to do so by signing the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968, providing the nations of the world who do not have the devices would refrain from developing them.  Now those countries are beginning to think that maybe they should get their own bomb if the U.S., Russia, China, Britain and France not only hold on to those they have, but proceed to improve them.


One small country, The Marshall Islands is taking the nuclear powers to court in the International Court of Justice, because of our inaction.  Chances are if the court rules in favor of the small nation, we and the other powers will simply ignore the verdict, but maybe it will cause some embarrassment to Obama, Putin and their fellow travelers.  The people of the Marshall Islands know first hand the effects of nuclear explosions…they were a proving ground for our tests back in the ‘50s.

Today, they pay the price  with sky-rocketing cancer rates and a radio active environment.


Some of us remember the frightening days of the Cuban Missile crisis when the hand was at one minute to midnight.  We came very close to seeing the end of civilization as we know it.  Fortunately, the Soviets blinked and all-out war was avoided.


Do we really want to pass along the threat of nuclear warfare, by accident or design, which could destroy life on earth, to our grandchildren and great grandchildren?


Studies conclude that even a small regional nuclear war such as one between India and Pakistan using just 100 Hiroshima size bombs out of the 16,330 weapons in today’s stockpiles would result in up to two billion deaths due to  the dramatic climate change and famine that would follow.  Experts agree that there would be no possible adequate medical response to such a calamity.


We must all speak out against the Congressional and Administration plans to spend up to a trillion dollars in the next three decades “modernizing” the nuclear arsenal and delivery systems.  This is the ultimate waste of taxpayer funds that are badly needed in so many other areas, such as infrastructure, health care, education, etc., etc.


The greatest threats to us today and in the near future are  terrorist organizations, failed states, environmental destruction and climate chaos.  None of these threats can be dealt with by a “modernized” nuclear arms system.


One hopeful sign I see is in the leadership of Pope Francis.  I am not Catholic, but am inspired by his call for building fraternity among the nations.  He challenges us to take care of the poor, return to the messages of Jesus, and end war.


As Nobel Peace Prize winner Mairead Maguire states: “Today, in the 21stCentury, as we the human family face increasing violence, we are challenged to admit that we are on the wrong path, and that we need to find new ways of thinking and doing things from a global perspective.”


The international day for the total elimination of nuclear weapons was established by the United Nations General Assembly in order to increase public awareness about the threat  these weapons  pose to humanity.  So, the small countries of the world get it.  I have heard that there is a move to abolish the Security Council, whose five veto-wielding members just happen to be the nuclear powers.  Maybe this would be a good idea.  The world is ready to outlaw the terrible devices.  It’s sad that we are standing in the way.


It is tempting to say that what I do won’t do anything to change the course of world events, but if a critical mass of ordinary citizens demands peace and an end to war, our leaders will have to get the message.  Apathy will ensure that we continue down the pathway toward midnight and the end of the good life we have enjoyed.

by columnist Dr. Bob Hanson, Rossmoor News

December 21, 2014

Armageddon or Disarmageddon:  We Have A Choice

by Roger Kotila, Ph.D.


As the war on terror deepens in the Middle East, the spreading military chaos raises the question of an Armageddon scenario—the Biblical prophecy of the end of the world.


Professor Michel Chossudovsky’s carefully documented 102 page "Towards A World War III Scenario" offers an ominous warning: "The U.S. has embarked on a military adventure, a 'long war', which threatens the future of humanity."  


So is Armageddon inevitable, or do antiwar activists have a peaceful alternative? 


The public is largely unaware of the Earth Constitution—what I’ve described as a “gift to humanity” waiting to be discovered, and perhaps our best option to bring about a fundamental change from a geopolitical war system to a global peace system.   


Unfortunately for the world, there are millions of Christians who believe that a “final battle”, literally, is on its way. Some, who believe in the Rapture, welcome it.   


Provoking conflict

For example, some Christian groups help fund illegal Israeli settlements in Palestinian territory which serves to provoke dangerous eruptions of conflict—another step closer to a “final battle.”


Chossudovsky notes that the Global War on Terrorism is presented to the public as a "clash of civilizations."  Islamic extremists are said to seek a global caliphate under Islamic law, whereas the US/NATO/Israel are described as defending themselves and Western values.  


Yet the real conflict, Chossudovsky concludes, is not about values and religion, but an "outright war of conquest, guided by strategic and economic objectives." In other words,   US domination in the Middle East for military advantage and control of oil and other resources.


Longing for Jesus at any cost

Chossudovsky’s analysis of Middle East hostilities may be generally accurate, but he may underestimate the role of Armageddon enthusiasts. There are millions of Christians who believe that we are now witnessing signs of the Last Days that will culminate in Armageddon.    


Indeed, prophecies in both the Old and New Testament warn of a time of suffering, death and destruction of epic proportions--a war between good and evil prior to the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.


The belief in End Times coupled with a longing for the return of Jesus Christ, causes some Christians to ignore, or reject outright, the antiwar movement.


If it takes Armageddon before Jesus will return, then so be it—bombs away!


One might dismiss Last Days prophecy as delusional fantasy, except for the very real existence of nuclear weapons, and documented options developed by the Pentagon and NATO to use nukes on the conventional battlefield, and by US/Israel for a surprise attack against Iran.


There are eerie similarities between prophecy and current geopolitical conflicts.

For example, in the Gospel of Luke (Chapter 21):  “Then he said to them, Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom…And there will be terrors and great signs from heaven…”


In the Book of Revelation (Chapter 16) St. John’s bizarre vision describes a God that orders his angels to “…pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth.”


An angel “…poured his vial upon the sun—and power was given unto him to scorch men with fire.” “For they are the spirits of devils…which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty…And he gathered them together into a place called…Armageddon.”


Would Jesus be a peace activist?

Which raises an unusual question:  If Jesus returned today, either in spirit or in person, would he become a peace activist?  Would he speak out against nuclear war and Armageddon?


Fortunately for humanity, Jesus Christ is known more for his desire for peace than a demand for war.  Among Christians he is proudly proclaimed to be the “Prince of Peace”.


In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew, Chapter 5) Jesus preached that “Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the children of God.”


Isaiah 9:6-7 predicts that “a son is born” whose name shall be called “Wonderful,” “Counselor,” “The mighty God,” “The Prince of Peace.”  “Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end…”


In Isaiah 2:2-4 we read, “And He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nations shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any  more.”


A path to safety

World federalists believe that there is a path to safety that can eliminate nuclear weapons, and end war.  We must establish a democratic world federation.  World union must replace competition for resources and military advantage.


When Texas and California have a conflict, they don’t go to war, they go to Court, or to Congress.  Disputes are resolved peacefully.  Peaceful solutions are possible because the states are in a federal union government under the U.S. Constitution. In similar fashion, nations must join in a world federal union government under the Earth Constitution.

The public has a right to know that there is a civilized way to govern the world without war or nuclear endangerment.  We know what to do. The Earth Constitution took thirty years to draft by visionaries anticipating this moment in history.


By Roger Kotila, Ph.D.

Editor, Earth Federation News & Views

Editorial: Climate marches may well promote, not prevent, climate collapse

Glen Martin, PhD

by Glen T. Martin, PhD*

The largest environmental protest march in history took place in New York on September 21, a truly massive event that was intended to send a message to participants in the U.N. Climate Conference scheduled to convene in Paris in mid-November. The march included famous environmentalist spokespersons such as Al Gore, Bill McKibben, Jane Goodall, and Vandana Shiva as well as concerned political leaders such as Senators Bernie Sanders and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

However, all the concern, protest, and the making of speeches in the world will not save the environment if we don’t direct our attention to the root political cause of the destruction of our planetary environment. Sadly, it is likely that not one speech at the climate march by these leaders even touched on this primary issue. And those who will be meeting in Paris in November (representatives of sovereign nation-states and their corporate backers) will never mention the root cause, and so the likelihood of their being any progress in Paris is close to zero.

The root causes of climate collapse are not ignorance, and they are not lack of good will to protect the climate. We know a great deal about ecosystems, pollution, and how the destruction works. And probably most corporate leaders, politicians, and citizens genuinely care about the environment. Neither are the root causes due to lack of popular support. Everywhere people are trying to recycle, conserve energy, and minimize their ecological footprints, and governments are offering tax incentives for environmentally friendly technology. But none of this is sufficient to prevent climate collapse.

The root causes of environmental destruction are not primarily psychological but structural. It is not so much a question of will and caring but the issue of the modern world system itself. The delegates meeting in Paris to discuss climate change will be representatives of a global capitalism inextricably interwoven with a system of sovereign nation-states, each state promoting its own multi-national corporations and competing with the others for power, influence, position, resources, and markets.

Many of these representatives have long known the disturbing facts of climate collapse. The first U.N. environmental conference took place in Stockholm in 1972. The disturbing facts about climate change were well known to those attending the giant U.N. environmental conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. Its famous document “Agenda 21” was in many ways right on target in its demand for significant reduction of greenhouse gases by the dawn of the 21st century. The U.N. worldwide environmental conference that followed this, in Johannesburg in 2002, recognized the near total failure of the nations and corporations of the world to meet the Agenda 21 goals. The same recognition was there in the 2009 U.N. environmental conference in Copenhagen. The nations of the world, colonized almost exclusively by global corporate capitalism, have been unable to make any significant progress in preventing or slowing climate collapse.

Why don’t we get the picture? The climate threat is obviously a planetary problem, and 193 sovereign nations can never act as a legal planetary organization to regulate corporations or restrain all the nations simultaneously and equitably. To be a sovereign nation means to recognize no enforceable law above itself. In a competitive system of lawless sovereign nations, there can never be consistent global laws protecting the environment or restraining the greed of corporations.

To prevent climate change we need system change. The present world system makes climate collapse inevitable. In my 2013 book, The Anatomy of a Sustainable World: Our Choice between Climate Change or System Change, the frightening facts about the on-going destruction of our planetary ecosystem are laid out through the words of the climate scientists themselves. The book shows what is necessary for a sustainable world system: a world parliament legislating enforceable environmental laws and economic principles that end the rape of the planet’s forests, oceans, and fossil resources; plus legislative efforts to convert everyone—all 7 billion people, 193 nation-states, and multi-national corporations—to sustainable ways of producing, recycling, and drawing on renewable clean energy sources. This book shows in detail how this sustainability system has been carefully designed within the Earth Constitution.

It has to be everyone or it will be no one. The U.N. can be the vehicle for this system-transformation, if its unworkable Charter, premised as it is on the absurdity of lawless sovereign nation-states, is replaced with the Constitution for the Federation of Earth. The Earth will then have a World Parliament, a World Court system with universal jurisdiction, and a civilian World Police that can make sustainability happen, protecting the future of our planet and our children. All the nations will then flourish as democratic units within this Earth Federation. But this conversion based on the simple truth that it has to be everyone or no one simply cannot happen under the anarchy of lawless, militarized sovereign states who put environmental concerns way down on the list while they promote their influence, power, struggle over natural resources, and competition for markets.

The Paris Conference this month will be a failure, and all the environmental protests and marches in the world will be a failure, as long as we fail to demand the conversion of the world from a fragmented war and greed system to a coherent Sustainability System, under a democratic World Parliament and enforceable world law. This must be the basis of our protests, our speaking out, and our influence as citizens. We must demand system-change, for the present world system is inherently destructive of the climate and our future. And the most practical means for true system change will be to replace the present U.N. Charter with the Constitution for the Federation of Earth, transforming our present planetary disorder to a system that is truly democratic, sustainable, and free.

*Glen T. Martin is President of the World Constitution and Parliament Association (WCPA), President of the Institute on World Problems, and Professor of Philosophy at Radford University in Virginia. Author or editor of 10 books, he is a member of the Board of the Democratic World Federalists and a frequent contributor to progressive on-line journals.

      October 7, 2014                                  NO-MORES
        by Mary Harris 
                                                                     peace activist, age 97 

Some say "Some-mores" are a delicious treat, but I haven’t tried them yet. I present here a truly delectable idea:  "No-mores."

Listed below are suggestions for a United World Government to assimilate into its administrative, judicial, and social system.  I assume of course that an eventual world government, probably or hopefully federal and democratic, will make “No-mores” an important part of the global good government system. 

No-more bombs
No-more war
No-more torture
No-more invading countries for their resources
No-more making enemies
No-more killing for land
No-more crude oil pipelines
No-more “fracking”
No-more “solving problems” by hating, killing, or revenge
No-more adult “trick or treat” (extortion)
No-more excuses for global violence
No-more massacres
No-more mass incarcerations
No-more starvation
No-more homelessness
No-more prejudice
No-more racism, sexism, or ageism 
No-more ghettos
No-more nonjudicial killings
No-more “all options are on the table” 
No-more police militarism
No-more hate education
No-more world anarchy
No-more surveillance

By Mary Harris
     Artist, retired teacher, and peace activist
      Age 97
      Democratic World Federalists
      San Francisco, California, USA 

     Support DEMOCRATIC WORLD FEDERALISTS  (   415.227-4880
     Discover the Earth Federation's EARTH CONSTITUTION ( 415.328-2341
September 18, 2014
WCPA Statement for the International Youth Anti-Imperialist Conference in Istanbul at the end of October, 2014


World Constitution and Parliament Association

Locations in Africa, Costa Rica, Bangladesh, India, Libya, Macedonia, Malaysia, Thailand, and USA

Statement on Imperialism


he World Constitution and Parliament Association (WCPA) was founded in 1958 by Philip Isely and others in order to establish a world of peace, justice, and freedom for all people on Earth.  These early founders of WCPA understood that World War II was a war amongst imperial nations for hegemony and control of Europe and the world. They wrote the Constitution for the Federation of Earth in order to end the system of militarized imperial nation-states and create a decent, equitable world system for all peoples.


These founders understood that the modern age of militarized nation-states has always been based on imperialism. In the 16th and 17th centuries it was the Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese who ravaged the world in search of colonies and riches. In the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries, it has been the British, French, Germans, Russians, and Americans who have dominated the global in competition for markets, cheap resources, slaves and spheres of colonial or neo-colonial control.


Today, many top scholars have identified the structure of this world system as a whole.  It is a system that economically and militarily revolves around a global hegemon, a global center of power that dominates the planet.  Such a center of power may be composed of a militarized coalition of dominating nations, such as NATO.  Yet since World War II, these scholars have often identified Washington, DC, as the major location for this global imperial center.


The work of World System Scholars further divides the remaining countries of the world into groups of nations called “semi-peripheral” and “peripheral” nations. Peripheral nations make up the majority of nations and people on Earth, mostly in the global south.  They are kept in a condition of economic impoverishment, low technology, and relative weakness by the imperial system.  Their function is to supply cheap labor and cheap raw materials to the imperial center and its allies. 


Semi-peripheral nations share some characteristics with both the imperial center nations and the peripheral nations. They are somewhat more developed in technology, infrastructure, and industry. Semi-peripheral nations may aspire to become part of the center. However, like the peripheral nations they are subject to manipulation, subversion, invasion, or overthrow by the security, economic, and military forces of the imperial center. These nations may also themselves occasionally engage in imperialism, invading, manipulating, or overthrowing their weaker neighbors.


The World Constitution and Parliament association recognizes peoples’ need to resist specific acts or systems of imperialism.  However, imperialism is built into the world system.  Historically the imperial center has changed, but the world system remains in place. The only practical way to end imperialism and protect the rights and dignity of all nations and all people on Earth is to transform the world system itself.  The Constitution for the Federation of Earth, and sessions of the Provisional World Parliament, are the best possible ways to address the scourge of imperialism.


We must establish a non-military, democratic Earth Federation that transforms the economy of Earth into one that serves all people equitably, that ends war and militarism among nations, and that protects the human rights and dignity of all peoples everywhere.  It is not enough to be “anti-imperialist.” We can and must demonstrate the alternative.  We must all work in solidarity to ratify the Earth Constitution. This is the only way to transform the imperialistic world system into a world based on freedom, peace, and justice. Please join WCPA—and stand in solidarity for a decent world system for everyone on the Earth.

July 27, 2014

Bad Religion/Good Religion and War: Zionists, Palestine, Gaza, ISIS

Religious extremists frequently hijack a religion and bring out the worst in it, rather than the best.  "Good religion" becomes a victim of "bad religion".  Under the spell of bad religion we see the emergence of intolerance, hate, fear, and exceptionalism -- a poisonous brew that can lead to violence and war.  
We have seen the tragic effects of "bad religion" in all major faiths, but the current war in Israel/Palestine/Gaza and Iraq/Syria highlight the danger when bad religion overcomes good religion, and there is no global authority capable of limiting the conflict. The current wars in the Middle East reveal an underbelly of theological ideology feeding the violence. 
The vast majority of all religions practice what may be defined as "good religion," and pose no threat to the safety and security of our world. But in times of religious extremism and geopolitical opportunism, the moderate and morally healthy voices of religion are drowned out by sociopathic extremists who practice division and exceptionalism.   
When extremists hijack religion
History and current geopolitics are full of tragic examples of what happens when extremists hijack a religion.  Hitler used Christianity against the Jews.  Jewish Zionists interpret the Old Testament to justify stealing the land and homes of the Palestinians.  Claiming to be God's "chosen" people, Zionists argue that the "Promised Land" was meant for them.  Violent force has been the Israeli Zionists' method of choice that is currently being used to bring the Palestinians in Gaza back into submission.
The forcible heist of Palestinian lands by Israel is being aided by fundamentalist Christians who long for Armageddon, and by American Empire seeking more control in the Middle East. (The American Congress recently voted unanimously to support the right of Israel to violently destroy an almost defenseless, imprisoned Gaza population. Nothing was said about Palestinians' rights to freedom and equality.)
Speeding up the end of the world
Christian fundamentalists help fund illegal Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands to fulfill Biblical prophecy and to provoke a final war in the Middle East. They seek to quicken the pace to an Armageddon (massive death and destruction) telling themselves that then the promised Rapture will occur, and Christ will return.  
The United Nations has been unable to prevent the routine violations by Israel of international law and UN mandates. The UN lacks an effective and fair world judiciary and enforcement system. (The Earth Constitution would correct this fatal flaw in the UN Charter.)
When the Palestinians protest their captivity in Gaza by building tunnels to the outside and firing rockets against Israel, so much the better for Armageddon loyalists.
When bad religion is in the driver's seat, the good and decent people of the world who practice a loving and kindly form of their religion become victims themselves. This irony is illustrated in an important attached article by a thoughtful Muslim scholar, Dr. Aslam Abdullah. 
It is an important article that challenges the negative stereotypes of the Muslim faith currently demonized by much of mainstream American media -- what appears to be a propaganda campaign to insure that Americans have an "enemy" to fear and loath. Instilling fear is a handy tool for the military/industrial/national security complex to insure large budgets (and big profits).
Dr. Abdullah brings out the core goodness from the Quran -- the loving principles that define the authentic Islamic faith practiced by the vast majority of all Muslims, yet at the same time he addresses the problem of extremism such as reported regarding ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria).  
Authentic Islam rejects extremist violence
Dr. Abdullah challenges those (extremist) Muslims who have called for death of those who criticize, or show irreverence toward the Prophet Muhammad and the Islamic faith.
Blaspheme, Abdullah explains, never justifies punishment by death which is contrary to the teachings and the actual life lived by the Prophet.  
ISIS is allegedly insisting upon sharia law, parts of which violate universal human rights such as punishing females who seek the same freedoms given men, and threatening punishment by death for blaspheme or other forms of apostasy.  Dr. Abdullah's description of authentic Islamic values suggests that the ISIS use of sharia law is wrong, and not representative of true Islam.  
Abdullah's article, titled "Is Blaspheme Punishable by Death in Islam?" helps us to understand bad and good religion, and is an antidote to western media prejudices that have demonized the Muslim faith.  Below is the link (you may need to copy and paste)*
*Thanks to for permission to publish. Other relevant articles can be found on their website at  The article was also published 5/7/2011 in the Muslim Observer.
Path to a peaceful and safe world
The misuse of sacred texts (by Muslims, Jews, Christians, etc.) is a major obstacle to world union and to a peaceful, prosperous and safe world.  We need more theologians like Dr. Abdullah to speak out when their own religion is captured by extremists.   
We know that the vast majority of all religious faiths consist of moderates who favor love, kindness, and tolerance of others, and who simply seek a peaceful, safe, and healthy world for themselves, their families, and their communities.
The Earth Constitution offers a solution not found in the UN Charter. It provides for peaceful alternatives to war to resolve conflicts by means of enforceable world laws and a democratically elected World Parliament.  It insures freedom of religion but also protection for universal human rights.  
-- R Kotila, Ph.D.
    Editor, Earth Federation News & Views  
June 1, 2014
Ukraine, NATO, and more:  Time for the UN to look to the Earth Constitution? 
The United Nations Charter seeks "to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war," but has not been able to live up to its rhetoric.  
From the UN's inception in 1945 in San Francisco world federalists warned that the UN's Charter was fatally flawed. Sure enough, geopolitical hotspots and war have erupted with regularity.
The current crisis in the Ukraine is the latest example of UN helplessness.  The elected government of the Ukraine was overthrown with covert help from the United States, and then Russia, fearful of encroachment by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, proceeded to annex Crimea.  
Politicians and the public are largely unaware that there is a potential solution to these dangerous geopolitical maneuverings that could spark a world war. The Earth Constitution is waiting.  It is ready to go.
Scourge of war out of reach for the UN
Ending the "scourge of war" has been out of reach for the UN.  Weaker countries are routinely the victims of Bully nations who use covert operations, economic manipulation, and outright military aggression to control or overthrow governments.
The UN's defective Charter allows the leaders of the  so-called "great" powers to toss international law aside, indeed to do almost anything at all, with impunity. The UN watched helplessly as the United States illegally invaded first Afghanistan, then Iraq.
For the world community the leaders of bully nations are literally "above the law" as was seen in the brutal "shock and awe" attack on Iraq wherein the US president and the generals responsible for this illegal invasion were never prosecuted for their war crimes, including torture.
The UN has been unable to prevent wars by proxy. For example, it could not prevent the upheaval in Syria supported by Saudi Arabia, the US, and Russia. Saudi Arabia has openly provided the insurgents with money and weapons in its campaign for regime change, ironical in view of the fact that Saudi Arabia itself is a dictatorship.
Israel's brutal attack on the Palestinians in Gaza and its ongoing silent war against them in the form of a blockade have left the Palestinians essentially imprisoned in Gaza.  The UN cannot free them.
Israeli leaders have never been prosecuted for committing world crimes, nor have sanctions been applied  because the US protects Israel from consequences by using its veto power in the UN Security Council.  
UN overshadowed by the US/NATO 
The UN has been overshadowed by US/NATO.  The results have been disastrous for the countries invaded by this military alliance which ignores international law and makes its own rules, apparently motivated by the goal of world empire, and for "energy security" which one suspects means to satisfy the financial yearnings of private oil corporations. 
Targets of US/NATO assaults include Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya.  The people see their homes and cities destroyed, including the infrastructure so that basics like water and electricity are barely available.  Horrendous civil wars have resulted.  
Libya was targeted by the US/NATO and the dictator Muammar Khadafy deposed, yet the people are worse off than ever with the country devastated and in a state of anarchy. We see a similar fate for Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and soon, possibly the Ukraine.
In the Ukraine the UN is unable to prevent the internal interference by the United States that helped cause the violent overthrow by neo-fascists of its elected government.  To complicate matters,  US/NATO seeks a door into the Ukraine, a move that has caused apprehension for Russia since the Ukraine lies on its border.   
Is US/NATO a threat to world peace?
The UN has been unable to restrain US/NATO expansion. The facts about NATO as revealed by Mahdi Nazemroaya in "The Globalization of NATO" are alarming. The US/NATO military alliance, he reports, is carrying out plans to militarily encircle both Russia and China.
NATO's interest in the Ukraine along with the announcement by the US of its "pivot to Asia" confirms Nazemroaya's analysis. Fear of encirclement caused Russia to annex Crimea, and spurred China to begin to increase its own military might.  
US/NATO actions appear so irresponsible and reckless that it is even conceivable that an attempt at regime change may be in the making to oust Russian President Vladimir Putin who is currently being demonized by the western press.
One can reasonably conclude that NATO, basically a military alliance led by the US, threatens world peace because of its actions to expand worldwide, yet claims it only seeks "security."  But isn't that why we have the United Nations? 
The UN must turn to the Earth Constitution
It is easy to illustrate the UN's failures.  We are living them everyday through the news, -- always a new geopolitical conflict or outrage of one kind or another. Nations operate in a global war system.


The Earth Constitution provides a global peace system. Disputes between nations are resolved without war (which is outlawed). Conflicts are resolved peacefully through adjudication in specialized world courts, or by a democratically elected World Parliament -- lacking in the UN structure.

A core problem is that the UN cannot override the decisions of the undemocratic UN Security Council with its five permanent veto members who use the veto to protect themselves and their allies no matter what wrong they have committed.  The United States, Russia and China have most often abused this veto power.
The public knows little about the UN's real problems which go back to its unsatisfactory Charter. They know even less about the Earth Constitution, drafted by the World Constitution and Parliament Association in order to have a constructive alternative to the UN, one that has the potential to actually end war and the lawless anarchy which so undermines a civilized society.
Professor Glen T. Martin, author of "World Revolution Through World Law," has described the Earth Constitution as the "most important document" of the 20th and 21st centuries.  It is designed to accomplish what the UN has been unable to do.
The Earth Constitution offers a solution to the nightmare of war and nuclear weapons. Its design is for nonmilitary government both at the global and national levels, of critical importance because military power can never bring true security or peace, a lesson not understood by the US/NATO.
The only realistic goal for a safe and secure world must be world union. We must federate. The nations must form a world federation that truly represents the global community.  There must be enforceable world law in league with a democratically elected world parliament.  There is no shortcut. 
It is time for the UN and the peoples of the world to look to the Earth Constitution.
by Roger Kotila, Ph.D.
Editor, Earth Federation News & Views  at  

March 10, 2014

F-35, MAD, Suitcase Nukes, or... Why I Became a World Federalist

The new F-35  joint strike fighter aircraft is symbolic of what's fatally wrong with the Pentagon's long-standing war policy of mutual assured destruction (MAD). It may one day carry nuclear missiles. With 18.6 million lines of software code required for the F-35 to "function at its operational specifications" (Boardman, RSN, 9-22-13), one can only sigh in disbelief.


It is just another reason why it is time to end a  nuclear military policy defended by the dinosaurs at the Pentagon and richly funded by Congress.  A totally new nonmilitary security doctrine is desperately needed. It has appeared in the form of the Earth Constitution, and that is why I became a world federalist.


Increasingly technical, what could possibly go wrong?

As the world gets increasingly technical, the chances for something to go terribly wrong are virtually inevitable, a conclusion clearly explained in Eric Schlosser's "Command and Control," an in-depth investigation of nuclear weapons (Penguin Press, 2013). Technical failure or human error is inescapable.


Defense pundits have defended MAD because, so far, nuclear war has been avoided.  Unfortunately, the theory is based upon the rational notion that no one would attack the United States because we could totally destroy them in retaliation.  It makes perfect sense, and it works...except when it doesn't. 


It is tempting to believe that MAD isn't mad. Unfortunately, psychologically, the policy gives a false sense of security. MAD requires excessive nuclear weaponry which in turn increases the overall risk that, sooner or later, something will go horribly wrong.


MAD versus the 'David' factor

MAD fails to take into account a determined foe -- best illustrated in the Biblical legend of David and Goliath.  Despite the fact that Goliath was an overwhelmingly powerful foe, it did not deter David. 


At the operational level MAD consists of  the "nuclear triad" -- nuclear warheads that can be delivered from the air, under the sea, or from land.  But what about the 'David' factor?


The Defense Department, some years after Hiroshima, developed "man portable" atomic bombs.  Adam Rawnsley and David Brown ("The Littlest Boy", Foreign Policy, Jan./Feb. 2014) describe the original miniature nuke -- the B-54 Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM). It weighed 58 pounds and could be carried on the back of a soldier.


These miniaturized atomic bombs gave way to Edward Teller's thermonuclear hydrogen bombs -- vastly more powerful than the original atomic bomb, yet some as small as 3 feet in length -- small enough to fit in a large suitcase. 


The possibility of "suitcase" nukes coupled with the 'David' factor render the Pentagon's doctrine of massive retaliation hopelessly useless, and irresponsibly dangerous to the world.  Such miniaturized nukes in the hands of state directed terrorists (false flag operations), or non-state terrorists, could potentially be secretly placed in major cities.


Such a scenario renders the vastly expensive missile defense systems irrelevant.  Moreover, the nation of the vaporized city would not know who to retaliate against, making MAD useless.


First strike and launch on warning further endangers us

Seeking military advantage, or fearing an impending attack by an adversary, first strike has become part of Pentagon and North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) policy. Put differently, strategists have adopted the right to launch a surprise nuclear attack. 


Additionally, decision time is foolishly short. Many of our missiles are on "hair trigger" alert (i.e., launch on warning).


"In a nuclear crisis, the U.S. secret war plan calls for the president to decide in just 13 minutes what he should do in the event there is a serious warning of a missile attack," reports Pulitzer Prize recipient David Hoffman (Foreign Policy, Feb., 2013).   Thirteen minutes to decide to destroy the world?  What could possibly go wrong? 


What is wrong with this picture?

"Flag officers in unified combatant commands,... are now given authority by the US president to have operational control over nuclear weapons to launch attacks on their own prerogatives." (Nazemroaya, "The Globalization of NATO", 2012) 


Former nuclear commanders talk of handing over bombs to NATO units from other nations which, in retrospect, "you wouldn't trust with a .22 rifle."  (Eric Schlosser, Command and Control, 2013)


" Air Force general in charge of nuclear-tipped missiles relieved for drunkenness off duty -- follows a long list of officer wrong-doings over the last year."  (San Francisco Chronicle, 10-24-13)


"In just one example, in August, 2007, six nuclear warheads disappeared for two days between North Dakota's Minot and Louisiana's Barksdale Air Force bases." (San Francisco Chronicle, 12-11-11)  


"Twice this year alone, Air Force officers entrusted with the launch keys to nuclear-tipped missiles have been caught leaving open a blast door that is intended to help prevent a terrorist or other intruder from entering their underground command post..."  (Associated Press, 10-23-13)


A world free of nuclear danger...or, Why I became a world federalist

The world federalist solution provides the means for security without nuclear weapons.  By contrast, the United Nations system has been handicapped by its Charter, hence unable to eliminate nuclear weapons, or end war.


Einstein and other high level thinkers concluded many years ago that the world federalist solution is the (only) path to eliminate nuclear weapons. The world does not have to continue to live in the cold shadow of a nuclear nightmare. We know what to do.


Under the protection of a world constitution

A democratic world federal constitution gives nations a nonmilitary means to resolve conflicts. Differences between nations are resolved nonviolently -- by means of courts and enforceable world law, and a democratically elected world parliament.


The Earth Constitution, drafted by world federalists and world citizens worldwide, is now ready for ratification by the peoples of the world, and by the nations. 


by Roger Kotila, Ph.D.   Editor, Earth Federation News & Views

Peace Strategy Upgrade: Putting "Ending War Itself" on the Table

Written by Dr. Roger Kotila    First published on Reader Supported News
January 19, 2014
On January 1, 2014 an "invitation to join a movement" came across my desk from David Swanson, an articulate World Beyond War organizer announcing plans underway to launch a global movement to abolish war itself.

What was missing was clear recognition of the necessity to replace the current dysfunctional geopolitical system with the world federalist solution.

World federalists warned from the very beginning that the United Nations Charter was flawed, and that the UN system would not be able to abolish war.

That is why it seems important that Beyond War organizers look closely at the Earth Constitution -- a carefully designed democratic world federation that creates a new geopolitical system that actually could abolish war.

Swanson writes: "I'm involved in helping to organize a global campaign for the abolition of war. We've begun holding conference calls, setting up committees, discussing plans by list serve, raising funds, and creating a website. We plan to launch the campaign with a big international event on September 21, 2014."

"In the meantime, we're looking for input, advice, and participation from groups and individuals around the globe -- and not just peace groups. We're working to build a broad coalition of every organization that would like to see an end to war. All individuals and organizations, all over the world, are invited to sign a statement in support of ending all war..."

World Beyond War strategy appears to include the use of strong factual, emotional, and moral appeals to emphasize the terrible destructiveness of war, coupled with warnings of the always present danger of unexpected nuclear annihilation.

Activists will also be ..."expanding the global nonviolent peace force of civilian, trained, international, nonviolent peacekeepers and peacemakers who will be available to protect civilians and local peace and human rights workers endangered by conflicts in all parts of the world and to help build peace where there is or has been violent conflict."

If "ending war itself" captures the popular imagination, trained peacemakers determined to end war could conceivably organize and expand into an international "peace army" trained in nonviolent tactics.

Such a (global) peace army would be hard to ignore. It could make its voice heard. It could penetrate the propaganda of the military/industrial/secret operations/Big Money complex that year in and year out stirs up tensions, conflicts, and wars by creating a constant supply of invented, imagined, and real "enemies."

The total abolition of war will require more than powerful arguments, a global peace army, and brilliant nonviolent tactics to counter the military/industrial propaganda that fuels hate and fear.

A new geopolitical system must also be put into place.

Some activists cling to the notion that what is needed instead of a world federation is small government and local control. They are badly mistaken. Decentralized "local control" can never deal with the power of Big Money, Big Military, Big Police, and Big Secret Operations. Small, separate sovereign units simply make it easier for the powerful to divide, manipulate, conquer, and dominate.

There are some on the Left who believe that the real problem is capitalism, and what is needed is not a world federation but a new economic system. To be sure, money is like water, everybody needs it. Deprived of water in the garden of life, you and your family are flowers that will wilt away in the unforgiving grip of poverty.

But even if all nations transformed into democratic socialist economies beneficial and fair to all citizens, without a world federal union they would soon be at each other's throats -- fighting for oil, over water, or you name it.

We must face the fact that we will need a democratic world federation. There is no shortcut.

As World Beyond War organizers review and refine overall strategy, the Earth Constitution could emerge as a key factor, particularly if activists decide that the current geopolitical system must be changed.

The Earth Constitution deserves serious study. Its significance is not unlike the Magna Carta or the U.S. Constitution except now federalist and democratic principles are to be applied to all nations and peoples.

The public is largely unaware that there exists a rational and practical solution to the problem of war. Our lives need not be darkened by the fact that at any moment nuclear annihilation could erupt.

There is a way out. The Earth Constitution could become the beacon for world union, and the foundation for a world that is safe, democratic, prosperous, and fair to all.

World Beyond War serves a vital purpose when it boldly rejects war itself, and demands that war be abolished. Its agenda wisely goes beyond war, to include peace and social justice, the environment, and human rights.

We know what to do. We can fix this. We can end this nightmare.

Article by Roger Kotila     415.328-2341
Earth Federation News & Views  at
16 January 2014
EARTH CONSTITUTION THE MISSING LINK FOR "WORLD BEYOND WAR"?  [Ending war is a top priority. The "World Beyond War" strategy has exciting potential for real progress.  Read David Swanson's behind-the-scenes appeal to activists, followed by this editor's advocacy to utilize the Earth Constitution as a key tool to unify groups worldwide, and as the foundation to begin building the type of good government structure that will be needed to successfully abolish war.]
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:58 AM, David Swanson <> wrote:

Invitation to Join a Movement:
I'm involved in helping to organize a global campaign for the abolition of war.  We've begun holding conference calls, setting up committees, discussing plans by listserve, raising funds, and creating a website.  We plan to launch the campaign with a big international event on September 21, 2014.  In the meantime, we're looking for input, advice, and participation from groups and individuals around the globe -- and not just peace groups.  We're working to build a broad coalition of every organization that would like to see an end to war.  All individuals and organizations, all over the world, are invited to sign a statement in support of ending all war, and to join in the planning of this new movement at  Here is the statement.
   I understand that wars and militarism make us less safe rather than protect us, that they kill, injure and traumatize adults, children and infants, severely damage the natural environment, erode civil liberties, and drain our economies, siphoning resources from life-affirming activities. I commit to engage in and support nonviolent efforts to end all war and preparations for war and to create a sustainable and just peace.

To sign this, and to get involved in many different ways, 
individuals should click here and organizations here.
When you sign, nothing more is required, but you can indicate -- if you choose -- how you would like to be involved.  You can also send questions, concerns, comments, and ideas to 

Here's a bit more about what we're thinking:
Public opinion is moving against particular wars and the world's spending of $2 trillion every year on war and preparations for war. We plan to announce the launching of a broad movement capable of ending war preparations and transitioning to a peaceful world. We are creating the tools necessary to communicate the facts about war and discard the myths. We are creating ways to assist organizations around the world that are working on partial steps in the direction of a war-free world -- including developing peaceful means of achieving security and resolving conflict -- and to increase widespread understanding of such steps as progress toward war's complete elimination.
   If unnecessary suffering on an enormous scale is to be avoided, we must abolish war. Some 180 million people died in wars in the 20th century and, while we have not yet repeated a war on the scale of World War II, wars are not going away. Their devastation continues, measured in terms of deaths, injuries, trauma, millions of people having to flee their homes, financial cost, environmental destruction, economic drain, and erosion of civil and political rights.
   Unless we want to risk catastrophic loss or even extinction, we must abolish war. Every war brings with it both massive destruction and the risk of uncontrolled escalation. We are facing a world of greater weapons proliferation, resource shortages, environmental pressures, and the largest human population the earth has seen. In such a turbulent world, we must abolish sustained and coordinated militarized combat between groups (primarily governments) known as war, because its continuation puts all life on the planet at risk.

If we abolish war, humanity can not only survive and better address the climate crisis and other dangers, but will be able to create a better life for everyone. The reallocation of resources away from war promises a world whose advantages are beyond easy imagination. Some $2 trillion a year, roughly half from the United States and half from the rest of the world, is devoted to war and war preparation. Those funds could transform global efforts to create sustainable energy, agricultural, economic, health, and education systems. Redirection of war funding could save many times the lives that are taken by spending it on war.

While abolition is a larger demand than partial disarmament, which will be a necessary step along the way, if the case for abolition is made convincingly it has the potential to create support for serious and even total disarmament among people who would otherwise favor the maintenance of a large military for defense -- something that we've learned generates pressure for offensive warmaking. The first step in such a campaign must be persuading people of the possibility of, and the urgent need for, abolishing war. Awareness of the effectiveness of nonviolent action, nonviolent movements, and peaceful resolution of conflicts is growing rapidly, creating the increased possibility of persuading people that there are effective alternatives to war to resolve conflicts and achieve security.

The reduction and eventual elimination of war and the re purposing of the military-industrial complex could be of great benefit to sectors of the world economy and of public services to which that investment could be transferred. We are creating a broad coalition encompassing civilian industries and advocates for green energy, education, housing, healthcare, and other fields, including civil liberties, environmental protections, children's rights, and the governments of cities, counties, states, provinces, and nations that have had to make major cuts in social programs for their people. By demonstrating that war is not inevitable and that it is actually possible to eliminate war, this movement will develop the allies needed to make it a reality.

Resistance, including by those profiting financially from wars, will be intense. Such interests are, of course, not invincible. Raytheon's stock was soaring in the summer of 2013 as the White House planned to send missiles into Syria -- missiles that were not sent after dramatic public opposition arose. But ending all war will require defeating the propaganda of war promoters and countering the economic interests of war promoters with alternative economic possibilities. A wide variety of support for "humanitarian" and other particular varieties, or imagined varieties, of war will be countered with persuasive arguments and alternatives. We are creating a resource center that will put the best arguments against various types of war support at everyone's fingertips.

By organizing internationally, we will use progress made in one nation to encourage other nations to match or surpass it without fear. By educating people whose governments make war at a distance about the human costs of war (largely one-sided, civilian, and on a scale not widely understood) we will build a broad-based moral demand for an end to war. By presenting the case that militarism and wars make us all less safe and decrease our quality of life, we will strip war of much of its power. By creating awareness of the economic trade-offs, we will revive support for a peace dividend. By explaining the illegality, immorality, and terrible costs of war and the availability of legal, nonviolent and more effective means of defense and conflict resolution, we will build acceptance for what has only relatively recently been made into a radical proposal and ought to be viewed as a common sense initiative: the abolition of war.

While a global movement is needed, this movement cannot ignore or reverse the reality of where the greatest support for war originates. The United States builds, sells, buys, stockpiles, and uses the most weapons, engages in the most conflicts, stations the most troops in the most countries, and carries out the most deadly and destructive wars. By these and other measures, the U.S. government is the world's leading war-maker, and -- in the words of Martin Luther King, Jr. -- the greatest purveyor of violence in the world. Ending U.S. militarism would eliminate the pressure that is driving many other nations to increase their military spending. It would deprive NATO of its leading advocate for and greatest participant in wars. It would cut off the largest supply of weapons to the Middle East and other regions.

But war is not a U.S. or Western problem alone. This movement will focus on wars and militarism around the globe, helping to create examples of effective alternatives to violence and war, and examples of demilitarization as a path to greater, not lesser, security.  Short-term goals may include economic conversion commissions, partial disarmament, elimination of offensive but not defensive weapons, base closures, bans on particular weapons or tactics, promotion of diplomacy and international law, expansion of peace teams and human shields, promotion of nonmilitary foreign aid and crisis prevention, placing restrictions on military recruitment and providing potential soldiers with alternatives, drafting legislation to redirect war taxes into peace work, encouraging cultural exchange, discouraging racism, developing less destructive and exploitative lifestyles, the creation of a peace conversion task force to help communities make the transition from war making to meeting human and environmental needs, and expanding the global nonviolent peace force of civilian, trained, international, nonviolent peacekeepers and peacemakers who will be available to protect civilians and local peace and human rights workers endangered by conflicts in all parts of the world and to help build peace where there is or has been violent conflict.

To get involved, individuals should click here and organizations here.

                                   *****                       *****                     *****

16 January 2014       Earth Federation News & Views

Editor Roger Kotila Reflects Upon the "World Beyond War" Strategy
The missing link to a permanent end to war is the world federalist solution.  The Earth Federation Movement, with its Earth Constitution,  offers a way to unite "we, the people" worldwide, and provides a brilliant democratic design to establish good government at the global level.

[Editor Kotila writes:] What seems to be missing in the "World Beyond War" plan ( is the world federalist solution.  That was Einstein's conclusion to end war, and that is why I believe the Constitution for the Federation of Earth (aka "Earth Constitution") needs our serious consideration. 

We must change the geopolitical system or the weapons of mass destruction will never be eliminated, wars will continue, poverty will remain a disgrace on the human race, and rights will be violated by whatever group of predators and sociopaths run this country, or that country, or this corporation, or that corporation.  The environment will continue to be endangered.  The United Nations has not been up to the task. 
The problem goes beyond economic change
Predatory, monopoly capitalism is part of the problem, but its elimination would not bring peace.  Socialist nations, each with independent sovereignty, would soon be at each other's throats, fighting for oil, or water, or you name it.  

We need a balance of economic socialism/and regulated capitalism.  The mixture of democratic socialism/capitalism seems positive to me, so long as the game of Monopoly is never allowed. 

Money is like water, everybody needs it.  Deprived of water in the garden of life, you and your family are flowers that wilt away in the unforgiving grip of poverty. 

No one should be above the Law
Universal human rights, although not perfect, are pretty good as a universal standard: Women's rights, children's rights, etc.  World crimes such as false flag operations, war crimes, torture, and crimes against humanity often go unpunished by those responsible.
But there must be a means to enforce violations of international and world law so that individuals in power who violate rights are held personally accountable (and suffer consequences such as going to jail).  
If we had a well-designed geopolitical system like the Earth Constitution, world criminals (I could give you a long list of dictators, president's, covert operatives, generals, tycoons, bankers, and others) would be arrested, given legal due process, and if convicted, placed in prison for their world crimes.  The key is individual accountability.  No one should be above the Law. 
Good government at the global level is possible 
Apprehension about the need for a democratic world federal union government is understandable, but I believe that the Earth Constitution provides the answers.  
The Constitution's democratic design rules out the danger of a world dictatorship.  There is a unique world judiciary system that allows "we, the people" a means to challenge and eliminate crooks in government and in the private sector.  
"FEDERAL" is very important as it means that the world government limits itself to those global problems (such as war, nukes, poverty, climate change) that can only be handled at the global level.  

Local problems remain solved at the local level.  Good government will mean new freedoms for local governments as resources become available that are now wasted on the military and black box operations.   

Abolishing war will take more than warnings, networking, and protests
The "World Beyond War" strategy of worldwide protests via networking is helpful, but not strong, or smart, enough.  As described to date, it is a consciousness-raising campaign that argues against war on moral, spiritual, and economic grounds.  It warns us of potential global catastrophe.
But to succeed we must simultaneously address the fatal flaws in the geopolitical system that have allowed and supported militarization and created what is essentially a global war system where basically "might makes right."  
The United Nations as a global governing system has been stymied by its Charter.  It cannot do the job.
The ideal in the UN Charter of (unlimited) national sovereignty (for those who reject a world federation) plays right into the hands of the multinational corporations/Big Money/Big Military who so often are the shot-cal